The theoretical literature on industrial organization has been argued that firms hold excess capacity to deter entry. However, empirical analysis did not provide much support to this hypothesis. In this paper we show that the dominant firms may hold excess capacity not for entry deterrence but for getting higher benefit from other business strategy such as licensing. We show that co-existence of licensing and excess capacity can be found if the marginal costs of the firms are small enough.Capacity commitment, Entry, Excess capacity, Incumbent, Licensing
We consider a monopolist’s precommitment to imitate a potential entrant’s innovation as a means of e...
This paper discusses the way that different operational characteristics including existing capacity,...
While the theoretical industrial organization literature has long argued that excess capacity can be...
Abstract: This paper provides a new rationale for holding excess capacity. We show that incumbent fi...
The theoretical literature demonstrates that excess capacity is not an equilibrium phenomenon if eac...
The theoretical literature demonstrates that excess capacity is not an equilibrium phenomenon if eac...
Excess capacities held by a dominant firm are usually viewed as ant icompetitive because they consti...
In a two period model of strategic entry deterrence where the incumbent firm moves before the entran...
We analyse sequential entry in a quantity-setting oligopoly model. Firms have the option to adopt ei...
This paper considers a mixed triopoly model where a state-owned firm, a domestic labor-managed firm ...
We analyse sequential entry in a quantity-setting oligopoly model. Firms have the option to adopt ei...
This paper considers the Dixit model of entry deterrence and adapts it to the case in which firms ar...
We show that, in the presence of technology licensing, entry in an industry with Cournot competition...
A model of a collusive duopoly in which each firm has limited capacity is studied. The negotiated ou...
Empirical evidence suggests that there are substantial and persistent differences in the sizes of fi...
We consider a monopolist’s precommitment to imitate a potential entrant’s innovation as a means of e...
This paper discusses the way that different operational characteristics including existing capacity,...
While the theoretical industrial organization literature has long argued that excess capacity can be...
Abstract: This paper provides a new rationale for holding excess capacity. We show that incumbent fi...
The theoretical literature demonstrates that excess capacity is not an equilibrium phenomenon if eac...
The theoretical literature demonstrates that excess capacity is not an equilibrium phenomenon if eac...
Excess capacities held by a dominant firm are usually viewed as ant icompetitive because they consti...
In a two period model of strategic entry deterrence where the incumbent firm moves before the entran...
We analyse sequential entry in a quantity-setting oligopoly model. Firms have the option to adopt ei...
This paper considers a mixed triopoly model where a state-owned firm, a domestic labor-managed firm ...
We analyse sequential entry in a quantity-setting oligopoly model. Firms have the option to adopt ei...
This paper considers the Dixit model of entry deterrence and adapts it to the case in which firms ar...
We show that, in the presence of technology licensing, entry in an industry with Cournot competition...
A model of a collusive duopoly in which each firm has limited capacity is studied. The negotiated ou...
Empirical evidence suggests that there are substantial and persistent differences in the sizes of fi...
We consider a monopolist’s precommitment to imitate a potential entrant’s innovation as a means of e...
This paper discusses the way that different operational characteristics including existing capacity,...
While the theoretical industrial organization literature has long argued that excess capacity can be...