Terrorism can strengthen or weaken electoral support for ruling governments. We show in a simple model of coalition formation that, regardless of the direction of a public opinion shock, the impact of terrorism on cabinet duration is ambiguous. However, in an analysis of a data set including 2,400 cabinets in over 150 countries in the period 1970-2002, we find that terrorism, on average, shortens cabinet duration. This result is robust for a range of alternative terror measures and is present in both democratic as well as autocratic political regimes
The purpose of this article is to explain the creation of terrorist organizations by political parti...
The purpose of this article is to explain the creation of terrorist organizations by political parti...
This paper relies on the variation of terror attacks across time and space as an instrument to ident...
Terrorism can strengthen or weaken electoral support for ruling governments. We show in a simple mod...
We examine the relationship between terrorism and cabinet duration. Our data set includes more than ...
There are now several studies investigating empirical relationships between that of terrorism, elect...
The question of how terrorist campaigns end has only recently started to attract scholarly interest....
A key finding from the literature on terrorism suggests that autocratic countries experience less te...
The question of how coercive government policies affect the duration and outcome of terrorist campai...
Many terror attacks occur at the beginning of electoral terms. We present a game theoretical model ...
Though empirical research has generally demonstrated that democracies experience more terrorism than...
We examine the relationship between terrorism and electoral accountability. We find that terror has ...
We examine the relationship between terrorism and electoral accountability. We find that terror has ...
We examine the relationship between terrorism and electoral accountability. We find that terror has ...
Why do autocratic regimes have sometimes a weak reaction to terrorism, and conversely why do democra...
The purpose of this article is to explain the creation of terrorist organizations by political parti...
The purpose of this article is to explain the creation of terrorist organizations by political parti...
This paper relies on the variation of terror attacks across time and space as an instrument to ident...
Terrorism can strengthen or weaken electoral support for ruling governments. We show in a simple mod...
We examine the relationship between terrorism and cabinet duration. Our data set includes more than ...
There are now several studies investigating empirical relationships between that of terrorism, elect...
The question of how terrorist campaigns end has only recently started to attract scholarly interest....
A key finding from the literature on terrorism suggests that autocratic countries experience less te...
The question of how coercive government policies affect the duration and outcome of terrorist campai...
Many terror attacks occur at the beginning of electoral terms. We present a game theoretical model ...
Though empirical research has generally demonstrated that democracies experience more terrorism than...
We examine the relationship between terrorism and electoral accountability. We find that terror has ...
We examine the relationship between terrorism and electoral accountability. We find that terror has ...
We examine the relationship between terrorism and electoral accountability. We find that terror has ...
Why do autocratic regimes have sometimes a weak reaction to terrorism, and conversely why do democra...
The purpose of this article is to explain the creation of terrorist organizations by political parti...
The purpose of this article is to explain the creation of terrorist organizations by political parti...
This paper relies on the variation of terror attacks across time and space as an instrument to ident...