Objective: To compare a four-and six-implant maxillary overdenture after an observation period of 5 years. Material and methods: Fifty subjects with functional problems concerning their maxillary denture, who had ample bone volume in the anterior region to place four or six implants, were included and randomly assigned to either group. Implant and overdenture survival, clinical performance, marginal bone loss and patient satisfaction were assessed. Results: Forty-six patients completed the 5-year follow-up. One implant failed in the six implants group (99.2% survival) and none in the four implants group (100% survival). No overdentures had to be replaced during the observation period and the number of complications was limited. Clinical fun...
ObjectiveTo compare the treatment outcome of 4 vs. 6bar-connected implants in the posterior region o...
ObjectiveTo compare the treatment outcome of 4 vs. 6bar-connected implants in the posterior region o...
Objective To compare the treatment outcome of 4 vs. 6bar-connected implants in the posterior region ...
Objective: To compare a four-and six-implant maxillary overdenture after an observation period of 5 ...
<p>Objective Comparing treatment outcome of four and six bar-connected implants in the anterior maxi...
Objective Comparing treatment outcome of four and six bar-connected implants in the anterior maxilla...
Objective Comparing treatment outcome of four and six bar-connected implants in the anterior maxilla...
Objective Comparing treatment outcome of four and six bar-connected implants in the anterior maxilla...
Objective To compare clinical and patient-reported outcomes when providing maxillary overdentures on...
Objective To compare clinical and patient-reported outcomes when providing maxillary overdentures on...
Objective To compare clinical and patient-reported outcomes when providing maxillary overdentures on...
Objective: To compare a four-and six-implant maxillary overdenture after an observation period of 5 ...
Objective: To compare a four-and six-implant maxillary overdenture after an observation period of 5 ...
Objective: To compare a four-and six-implant maxillary overdenture after an observation period of 5 ...
ObjectiveTo compare the treatment outcome of 4 vs. 6bar-connected implants in the posterior region o...
ObjectiveTo compare the treatment outcome of 4 vs. 6bar-connected implants in the posterior region o...
ObjectiveTo compare the treatment outcome of 4 vs. 6bar-connected implants in the posterior region o...
Objective To compare the treatment outcome of 4 vs. 6bar-connected implants in the posterior region ...
Objective: To compare a four-and six-implant maxillary overdenture after an observation period of 5 ...
<p>Objective Comparing treatment outcome of four and six bar-connected implants in the anterior maxi...
Objective Comparing treatment outcome of four and six bar-connected implants in the anterior maxilla...
Objective Comparing treatment outcome of four and six bar-connected implants in the anterior maxilla...
Objective Comparing treatment outcome of four and six bar-connected implants in the anterior maxilla...
Objective To compare clinical and patient-reported outcomes when providing maxillary overdentures on...
Objective To compare clinical and patient-reported outcomes when providing maxillary overdentures on...
Objective To compare clinical and patient-reported outcomes when providing maxillary overdentures on...
Objective: To compare a four-and six-implant maxillary overdenture after an observation period of 5 ...
Objective: To compare a four-and six-implant maxillary overdenture after an observation period of 5 ...
Objective: To compare a four-and six-implant maxillary overdenture after an observation period of 5 ...
ObjectiveTo compare the treatment outcome of 4 vs. 6bar-connected implants in the posterior region o...
ObjectiveTo compare the treatment outcome of 4 vs. 6bar-connected implants in the posterior region o...
ObjectiveTo compare the treatment outcome of 4 vs. 6bar-connected implants in the posterior region o...
Objective To compare the treatment outcome of 4 vs. 6bar-connected implants in the posterior region ...