In this paper it is shown that the Verification Thesis (all truths are knowable) is only susceptible to Fitch’s Paradox if one conflates the de re and de dicto interpretation of knowability. A formalisation shows that if one treats knowability as a complex second-order predicate, then the paradox falls apart
According to the anti-realistic theory of meaning, everything that is true is knowable. Fitch’s (196...
The Church–Fitch argument, or 'paradox' of knowability, apparently shows that, if all truths are kno...
Reformulation strategies for solving Fitch’s paradox of knowability date back to Edgington. Their co...
In this paper it is shown that the Verification Thesis (all truths are knowable) is only susceptible...
The Knowability Paradox purports to show that the controversial but not patently absurd hypothesis t...
If we want to say that all truths are knowable Fitch’s Paradox leads us to conclude that all truths ...
In this paper we undertake an analysis of the knowability paradox in the light of modal epistemic lo...
International audienceAnti-realist epistemic conceptions of truth imply what is called the knowabili...
Famously, the Church-Fitch paradox of knowability is a deductive argument from the thesis that all t...
A well-known proof by Alonzo Church, first published in 1963 by Frederic Fitch, purports to show tha...
A well-known proof by Alonzo Church, first published in 1963 by Frederic Fitch, shows that all truth...
A number of philosophers have argued that any truth can be known. Truth only applies to meaningful l...
According to the “paradox of knowability”, the moderate thesis that (necessarily) all truths are kno...
The purpose of this paper is to show how the paradox of knowability loses its paradoxical character ...
After introducing semantic anti-realism and the paradox of knowability, the paper offers a reconstru...
According to the anti-realistic theory of meaning, everything that is true is knowable. Fitch’s (196...
The Church–Fitch argument, or 'paradox' of knowability, apparently shows that, if all truths are kno...
Reformulation strategies for solving Fitch’s paradox of knowability date back to Edgington. Their co...
In this paper it is shown that the Verification Thesis (all truths are knowable) is only susceptible...
The Knowability Paradox purports to show that the controversial but not patently absurd hypothesis t...
If we want to say that all truths are knowable Fitch’s Paradox leads us to conclude that all truths ...
In this paper we undertake an analysis of the knowability paradox in the light of modal epistemic lo...
International audienceAnti-realist epistemic conceptions of truth imply what is called the knowabili...
Famously, the Church-Fitch paradox of knowability is a deductive argument from the thesis that all t...
A well-known proof by Alonzo Church, first published in 1963 by Frederic Fitch, purports to show tha...
A well-known proof by Alonzo Church, first published in 1963 by Frederic Fitch, shows that all truth...
A number of philosophers have argued that any truth can be known. Truth only applies to meaningful l...
According to the “paradox of knowability”, the moderate thesis that (necessarily) all truths are kno...
The purpose of this paper is to show how the paradox of knowability loses its paradoxical character ...
After introducing semantic anti-realism and the paradox of knowability, the paper offers a reconstru...
According to the anti-realistic theory of meaning, everything that is true is knowable. Fitch’s (196...
The Church–Fitch argument, or 'paradox' of knowability, apparently shows that, if all truths are kno...
Reformulation strategies for solving Fitch’s paradox of knowability date back to Edgington. Their co...
DOI
Add to ORKG