1. The circadian pacemakers controlling activity rhythms in four species of rodents are compared, as freerunning systems in constant darkness. In analyzing their stability the distinction is made between (1) spontaneous day-to-day instability of frequency, and (2) a longer-term lability, some of which is traceable to identified causes. 2. Serial correlation analysis indicates that the precision (day-to-day stability) of the pacemaker's period is ca. twice as good (estimated s.d. = 0.6 % of ¯τ in Mus musculus) as the already remarkable precision of the activity rhythm it drives (average s.d. = 1.2 % of ¯τ). 3. Identifiable causes of long-term lability include age and several features of prior entrainment by light. The period and photoperiod ...