Relationship between contrast sensitivity and spherical aberration Comparison of 7 contrast sensitivity tests with natural and artificial pupils in healthy eyes

PURPOSE: To find a contrast sensitivity test that can be used clinically to evaluate interventions aimed at minimizing spherical aberration and determine the circumstances under which these tests should be performed. SETTING: Laboratory of Experimental Ophthalmology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. METHODS: Contrast sensitivity tests were performed using 2 experimental designs. Design 1 was with a natural pupil under mesopic and photopic conditions. Design 2 was with a 5.0 mm artificial pupil after cycloplegia under photopic conditions only. Two computerized tests (vertical sine-modulated gratings [VSG] and Holladay circular sine-modulated patterns [HACSS]) and 5 chart tests (Pelli-Robson, acuity-measuring letter charts at low contrast [2.5% and 10%], VectorVision, and edge contrast sensitivity) were used. Spherical aberration was assessed with a Hartmann-Shack wavefront analyzer. RESULTS: Forty-nine healthy subjects aged 20 to 35 years (n = 24) and 55 to 70 years (n = 25) participated. Design 2 showed a significant relationship between contrast sensitivity and spherical aberration with the HACSS at 3 cycles per degree (cpd) (P = .03) and 6 cpd (P = .01) and with the VSG at 6 cpd (P = .01). Design 1 yielded no significant relationships. CONCLUSIONS: Using an artificial pupil, a relationship between contrast sensitivity and spherical aberration was established with the VSG and HACSS tests but not with the chart tests. No test showed a relationship using natural pupils under either lighting condition. Chart tests are unsuitable for uncovering contrast sensitivity differences related to differences in spherical aberration, as typically found in healthy phakic eyes