Objectives. To compare the estimation of coronary heart disease (CHD) risk by the Framingham risk score (FRS) and the Copenhagen risk score (CRS) using Dutch population data. Design. Comparison of CHD risk estimates from FRS and CRS. CHD risk-estimations for each separate risk factor. Setting. Urk, the Netherlands. Subjects. A total of 408 fishermen from Urk, aged 30-65 years, without pre-existing cardiovascular disease. Main outcome measures. Absolute CHD risk estimates. Results. The average 10-year risk for CHD was significantly different between the FRS (4.6%, SD 5.0) and the CRS (3.2%, SD 4.1). The correlation between the two estimates was 0.94 (P <0.001). The Bland-Altman figure shows a large proportion of agreement, but with an increa...
Background: Whether newer risk markers for coronary heart disease (CHD) improve CHD risk prediction ...
Framingham Risk Scores is an established method to predict an individual\u27s 10-year risk for coron...
The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of risk scores (Framingham, Assign and Q...
Objectives. To compare the estimation of coronary heart disease (CHD) risk by the Framingham risk sc...
Background: In clinical practice, Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) risk prediction funct...
Background: In Europe, for primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases (CVD), the Systematic COron...
textabstractBackground To evaluate the performance of Framingham predictions of cardiovascular disea...
OBJECTIVE: To establish the predictive accuracy of the Framingham risk score for coronary heart dise...
The question about what risk function should be used in primary prevention remains unanswered. The F...
BackgroundGuidelines for the prevention of coronary heart disease (CHD) recommend use of Framingham-...
A recalibrated cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk chart for the German population, Systematic Coronar...
OBJECTIVE - To test the validity of the Framingham, Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE), and...
Guidelines for the prevention of coronary heart disease (CHD) recommend use of Framingham-based risk...
AbstractBackgroundTo evaluate the performance of Framingham predictions of cardiovascular disease (C...
Currently, there is sparse data available on the relationship between coronary heart disease (CHD) a...
Background: Whether newer risk markers for coronary heart disease (CHD) improve CHD risk prediction ...
Framingham Risk Scores is an established method to predict an individual\u27s 10-year risk for coron...
The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of risk scores (Framingham, Assign and Q...
Objectives. To compare the estimation of coronary heart disease (CHD) risk by the Framingham risk sc...
Background: In clinical practice, Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) risk prediction funct...
Background: In Europe, for primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases (CVD), the Systematic COron...
textabstractBackground To evaluate the performance of Framingham predictions of cardiovascular disea...
OBJECTIVE: To establish the predictive accuracy of the Framingham risk score for coronary heart dise...
The question about what risk function should be used in primary prevention remains unanswered. The F...
BackgroundGuidelines for the prevention of coronary heart disease (CHD) recommend use of Framingham-...
A recalibrated cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk chart for the German population, Systematic Coronar...
OBJECTIVE - To test the validity of the Framingham, Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE), and...
Guidelines for the prevention of coronary heart disease (CHD) recommend use of Framingham-based risk...
AbstractBackgroundTo evaluate the performance of Framingham predictions of cardiovascular disease (C...
Currently, there is sparse data available on the relationship between coronary heart disease (CHD) a...
Background: Whether newer risk markers for coronary heart disease (CHD) improve CHD risk prediction ...
Framingham Risk Scores is an established method to predict an individual\u27s 10-year risk for coron...
The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of risk scores (Framingham, Assign and Q...