This paper concerns the reasoning with stories, evidence and generalisations in a legal context. We will make some notions from the existing Anchored Narratives theory more clear by making use of two formal techniques from AI, namely causal-abductive reasoning and default-style argumentation. We will propose a combination of these two formalisms which solves some of the problems of the causal-abductive approach
This paper studies the modelling of legal reasoning about evidence within general theories of defeas...
Sense-making software for crime investigation should be based on a model of reasoning about evidenc...
This paper studies the modelling of legal reasoning about evidence within general theories of defeas...
This paper concerns the reasoning with stories, evidence and generalisations in a legal context. We ...
Abstract. This paper concerns the reasoning with stories, evidence and generali-sations in a legal c...
In the present paper, we provide a formalised version of a merged argumentative and story-based appr...
In the present paper, we provide a formalised version of a merged argumentative and story-based appr...
Sense-making software for crime investigation should be based on a model of reasoning about evidence...
When procedural-support systems are to be useful in practice, they should provide support for causa...
Sense-making software for crime investigation should be based on a model of reasoning about evidence...
This paper presents a theory of reasoning with evidence in order to determine the facts in a crimina...
Crombag, Van Koppen and Wagenaar have proposed the anchored narratives theory as a tool for establis...
Sense-making software for crime investigation should be based on a model of reasoning about ev-idenc...
Sense-making software for crime investigation should be based on a model of reasoning about evidence...
This paper studies the modelling of legal reasoning about evidence within general theories of defeas...
Sense-making software for crime investigation should be based on a model of reasoning about evidenc...
This paper studies the modelling of legal reasoning about evidence within general theories of defeas...
This paper concerns the reasoning with stories, evidence and generalisations in a legal context. We ...
Abstract. This paper concerns the reasoning with stories, evidence and generali-sations in a legal c...
In the present paper, we provide a formalised version of a merged argumentative and story-based appr...
In the present paper, we provide a formalised version of a merged argumentative and story-based appr...
Sense-making software for crime investigation should be based on a model of reasoning about evidence...
When procedural-support systems are to be useful in practice, they should provide support for causa...
Sense-making software for crime investigation should be based on a model of reasoning about evidence...
This paper presents a theory of reasoning with evidence in order to determine the facts in a crimina...
Crombag, Van Koppen and Wagenaar have proposed the anchored narratives theory as a tool for establis...
Sense-making software for crime investigation should be based on a model of reasoning about ev-idenc...
Sense-making software for crime investigation should be based on a model of reasoning about evidence...
This paper studies the modelling of legal reasoning about evidence within general theories of defeas...
Sense-making software for crime investigation should be based on a model of reasoning about evidenc...
This paper studies the modelling of legal reasoning about evidence within general theories of defeas...