This paper attempts to systematically characterize critical reactions in argumentative discourse, such as objections, critical questions, rebuttals, refutations, counterarguments, and fallacy charges, in order to contribute to the dialogical approach to argumentation. We shall make use of four parameters to characterize distinct types of critical reaction. First, a critical reaction has a focus, for example on the standpoint, or on another part of an argument. Second, critical reactions appeal to some kind of norm, argumentative or other. Third, they each have a particular illocutionary force, which may include that of giving strategic advice to the other. Fourth, a critical reaction occurs at a particular level of dialogue (the ground leve...
This paper examines arguments that take counterconsiderations into account, and it does so from a di...
Includes bibliographical references (pages [89]-93)This thesis fills a void in the field of rhetoric...
This paper examines arguments that take counter- considerations into account, and it does so from a ...
ABSTRACT: This paper attempts to systematically characterize critical reactions in argumentative dis...
This paper attempts to systematically characterize critical reactions in argumentative discourse, su...
Some critical reactions hardly give clues to the arguer as to how to respond to them convincingly. O...
This paper makes an independent start with formalizing the rules for the argumentation stage of crit...
Argumentation: Critical Thinking in Action, 3rd ed., explores a wide variety of issues and concepts ...
Some critical reactions hardly give clues to the arguer as to how to respond to them convinc-ingly. ...
This paper theorizes critical readings from an interactional / argumentative perspective, providing ...
In this paper, I present a dialogue game approach to the argumentation stage of a critical discussio...
It furthers the dialectic when the opponent is clear about what motivates and underlies her critical...
Some critical reactions hardly give clues to the arguer as to how to respond to them convincingly. O...
People always talk, discuss, argue, criticize or contradict each other. Have you ever thought of how...
The book offers a compact but comprehensive introductory overview of the crucial components of argum...
This paper examines arguments that take counterconsiderations into account, and it does so from a di...
Includes bibliographical references (pages [89]-93)This thesis fills a void in the field of rhetoric...
This paper examines arguments that take counter- considerations into account, and it does so from a ...
ABSTRACT: This paper attempts to systematically characterize critical reactions in argumentative dis...
This paper attempts to systematically characterize critical reactions in argumentative discourse, su...
Some critical reactions hardly give clues to the arguer as to how to respond to them convincingly. O...
This paper makes an independent start with formalizing the rules for the argumentation stage of crit...
Argumentation: Critical Thinking in Action, 3rd ed., explores a wide variety of issues and concepts ...
Some critical reactions hardly give clues to the arguer as to how to respond to them convinc-ingly. ...
This paper theorizes critical readings from an interactional / argumentative perspective, providing ...
In this paper, I present a dialogue game approach to the argumentation stage of a critical discussio...
It furthers the dialectic when the opponent is clear about what motivates and underlies her critical...
Some critical reactions hardly give clues to the arguer as to how to respond to them convincingly. O...
People always talk, discuss, argue, criticize or contradict each other. Have you ever thought of how...
The book offers a compact but comprehensive introductory overview of the crucial components of argum...
This paper examines arguments that take counterconsiderations into account, and it does so from a di...
Includes bibliographical references (pages [89]-93)This thesis fills a void in the field of rhetoric...
This paper examines arguments that take counter- considerations into account, and it does so from a ...