In this journal, Dicken & Lipton [2006] argued, following Musgrave [1985], that a constructive empiricist cannot coherently draw the distinction between observable objects (events, processes, …) and unobservable ones. We argue to the contrary: the distinction can be drawn coherently, but add a qualification to deal with an associated problem concerning the language of science
It is a commonplace observation that our ordinary language provides the resources for a variety of t...
Russo Federica. The reality of the unobservable . Observability, unobservability and their impact on...
A careful analysis of Salmon’s Theoretical Realism and van Fraassen’s Constructive Empiricism shows ...
An immersed philosopher of science who left this world too early. In this journal, Dicken & Lipt...
Several arguments (due to Friedman, Kukla, Foss, Musgrave and Creath) to the effect that the distinc...
There is a natural objection to the epistemic coherence of Bas van Fraassen’s use of a distinction b...
In this paper I argue—against van Fraassen’s constructive empiricism—that the practice of saving phe...
Van Fraassen’s distinction between observable and non-observable objects and his pragmatic conceptio...
In this paper, I argue against constructive empiricism that, as far as science is concerned, observa...
ABSTRACT. In this paper, I argue against constructive empiricism that, as far as science is concerne...
This paper presents a sketch of a moderately anti-realist position in philosophy of science that is ...
Van Fraassen bases his alternative to scientific realism, constructive empiricism, on a dichotomy b...
The Author(s) 2011. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract By focus...
In this paper, I argue against constructive empiricism that, as far as science is concerned, observa...
I develop a concept of observability that pertains to qualities rather than objects: a quality is ob...
It is a commonplace observation that our ordinary language provides the resources for a variety of t...
Russo Federica. The reality of the unobservable . Observability, unobservability and their impact on...
A careful analysis of Salmon’s Theoretical Realism and van Fraassen’s Constructive Empiricism shows ...
An immersed philosopher of science who left this world too early. In this journal, Dicken & Lipt...
Several arguments (due to Friedman, Kukla, Foss, Musgrave and Creath) to the effect that the distinc...
There is a natural objection to the epistemic coherence of Bas van Fraassen’s use of a distinction b...
In this paper I argue—against van Fraassen’s constructive empiricism—that the practice of saving phe...
Van Fraassen’s distinction between observable and non-observable objects and his pragmatic conceptio...
In this paper, I argue against constructive empiricism that, as far as science is concerned, observa...
ABSTRACT. In this paper, I argue against constructive empiricism that, as far as science is concerne...
This paper presents a sketch of a moderately anti-realist position in philosophy of science that is ...
Van Fraassen bases his alternative to scientific realism, constructive empiricism, on a dichotomy b...
The Author(s) 2011. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract By focus...
In this paper, I argue against constructive empiricism that, as far as science is concerned, observa...
I develop a concept of observability that pertains to qualities rather than objects: a quality is ob...
It is a commonplace observation that our ordinary language provides the resources for a variety of t...
Russo Federica. The reality of the unobservable . Observability, unobservability and their impact on...
A careful analysis of Salmon’s Theoretical Realism and van Fraassen’s Constructive Empiricism shows ...