This paper forms an appreciation of and a critical reflection on Sarasvathy’s work on causation and effectuation models of entrepreneurship. While Sarasvathy has made significant contributions to the field, it is suggested that a more fruitful approach can follow if two modifications are made. First, it is argued that the six dimensions on which the two models differ are independent and therefore that it is more fruitful to focus on the dimensions rather than on the two models. Second, it is argued that a pragmatist view on entrepreneurship is most fruitful when it is not applied at the level of the entrepreneurial process but at the level of the underlying human actions
We develop a subjectivist theory of entrepreneurship that focuses on individuals, their knowledge, r...
This paper is, effectively, a ‘short version’ of an article now published as: Hindle, K. (2010a). Sk...
The purpose of this study is to examine the relationships between entrepreneurial behaviour and effe...
This paper forms an appreciation of and a critical reflection on Sarasvathy’s work on causation and ...
In this research, entrepreneurial processes and entrepreneurial learning are key subjects. The aim i...
This article highlights the normative bias in the entrepreneurial theories of Schumpeter and Kirzner...
Are there any common denominators within the diversity of entrepreneurship literature that may serve...
International audienceThe realm of entrepreneurship has seen a rise in research on effectuation from...
We in this paper rethink the conventional ways of explaining the change process of new company forma...
We conclude by suggesting that entrepreneurship scholars pay attention to Ramoglou and Tsang’s criti...
This work analyzes entrepreneurship literature to show the inconsistency of exploring change within ...
This theoretical paper shows a powerful way to reconceptualise - in a constructivist manner - Effect...
In regards to the method, two types of strategies have been considered: qualitative and quantitative...
Abstract: The object of research is the process of entrepreneurship formation. The work co...
International audienceEntrepreneurship research attracts scholars from a wide spectrum of discipline...
We develop a subjectivist theory of entrepreneurship that focuses on individuals, their knowledge, r...
This paper is, effectively, a ‘short version’ of an article now published as: Hindle, K. (2010a). Sk...
The purpose of this study is to examine the relationships between entrepreneurial behaviour and effe...
This paper forms an appreciation of and a critical reflection on Sarasvathy’s work on causation and ...
In this research, entrepreneurial processes and entrepreneurial learning are key subjects. The aim i...
This article highlights the normative bias in the entrepreneurial theories of Schumpeter and Kirzner...
Are there any common denominators within the diversity of entrepreneurship literature that may serve...
International audienceThe realm of entrepreneurship has seen a rise in research on effectuation from...
We in this paper rethink the conventional ways of explaining the change process of new company forma...
We conclude by suggesting that entrepreneurship scholars pay attention to Ramoglou and Tsang’s criti...
This work analyzes entrepreneurship literature to show the inconsistency of exploring change within ...
This theoretical paper shows a powerful way to reconceptualise - in a constructivist manner - Effect...
In regards to the method, two types of strategies have been considered: qualitative and quantitative...
Abstract: The object of research is the process of entrepreneurship formation. The work co...
International audienceEntrepreneurship research attracts scholars from a wide spectrum of discipline...
We develop a subjectivist theory of entrepreneurship that focuses on individuals, their knowledge, r...
This paper is, effectively, a ‘short version’ of an article now published as: Hindle, K. (2010a). Sk...
The purpose of this study is to examine the relationships between entrepreneurial behaviour and effe...