Interfacial areas and gas hold-ups were determined at pressures of up to 1.7 MPa in a glass vessel, 88 mm in diameter and of standard geometry. Superficial gas velocities between 0.25 and 2.0 cm/s were used and the stirring speed varied between 4 and 30 rps. The interfacial areas were determined by the chemical method, using the model reaction between CO2 and aqueous diethanolamine (DEA). Hold-ups were determined by observation of differences in height. In contrast to literature indications, the gas hold-up was found to be independent of reactor pressure. This is also true for the interfacial area
KLa and gas–liquid interfacial area per unit volume were quantified in 2.5–20% n-C10–13 aqueous disp...
The influence of reactor pressure up to 6.0 MPa on the dynamic liquid hold-up in the trickle-flow re...
While most catalytic fixed bed gas-liquid reactors of the petrol industry work at quite high pressur...
Interfacial areas and gas hold-ups were determined at pressures of up to 1.7 MPa in a glass vessel, ...
Interfacial areas and gas hold-ups have been determined at pressures up to 8.0 MPa in a mechanically...
Interfacial areas and gas hold-ups have been determined at pressures up to 1.85 MPa in a bubble colu...
Interfacial areas and gas hold-ups have been determined at pressures up to 8.0 MPa in a mechanically...
The interfacial area achem in a gas-liquid contactor as determined by the chemical method deviates f...
The presence of an inert immiscible organic phase in gas�liquid dispersions in stirred vessels inf...
The reaction between CO2 and diethanolamine (DEA) in aqueous ethyleneglycol (ETG) at 298 K has been ...
Data on design and operation of trickle beds at elevated pressures are scarce. In this study the inf...
The gas-liquid interfacial area, which is determined by the gas hold-up and the Sauter mean bubble d...
A four-point optical fiber probe technique was employed in a split-cylinder airlift reactor with an ...
The interfacial area for a liquid–liquid system has been determined by the chemical reaction method....
The gas−liquid interfacial area, which is determined by the gas hold-up and the Sauter mean bubble d...
KLa and gas–liquid interfacial area per unit volume were quantified in 2.5–20% n-C10–13 aqueous disp...
The influence of reactor pressure up to 6.0 MPa on the dynamic liquid hold-up in the trickle-flow re...
While most catalytic fixed bed gas-liquid reactors of the petrol industry work at quite high pressur...
Interfacial areas and gas hold-ups were determined at pressures of up to 1.7 MPa in a glass vessel, ...
Interfacial areas and gas hold-ups have been determined at pressures up to 8.0 MPa in a mechanically...
Interfacial areas and gas hold-ups have been determined at pressures up to 1.85 MPa in a bubble colu...
Interfacial areas and gas hold-ups have been determined at pressures up to 8.0 MPa in a mechanically...
The interfacial area achem in a gas-liquid contactor as determined by the chemical method deviates f...
The presence of an inert immiscible organic phase in gas�liquid dispersions in stirred vessels inf...
The reaction between CO2 and diethanolamine (DEA) in aqueous ethyleneglycol (ETG) at 298 K has been ...
Data on design and operation of trickle beds at elevated pressures are scarce. In this study the inf...
The gas-liquid interfacial area, which is determined by the gas hold-up and the Sauter mean bubble d...
A four-point optical fiber probe technique was employed in a split-cylinder airlift reactor with an ...
The interfacial area for a liquid–liquid system has been determined by the chemical reaction method....
The gas−liquid interfacial area, which is determined by the gas hold-up and the Sauter mean bubble d...
KLa and gas–liquid interfacial area per unit volume were quantified in 2.5–20% n-C10–13 aqueous disp...
The influence of reactor pressure up to 6.0 MPa on the dynamic liquid hold-up in the trickle-flow re...
While most catalytic fixed bed gas-liquid reactors of the petrol industry work at quite high pressur...