In river flow applications, consensus on the most appropriate roughness descriptor has yet to be found. A disturbing observation is that the coefficients and formulae of Chézy, Darcy Weisbach, Manning, Strickler and White Colebrook are used rather arbitrarily, and that a widely accepted scientific justification is lacking. The presented paper compares the most commonly used roughness parameters, and reflects on some arguments that are often used in favour of, or against, any of these. Some recent advances on the theoretical basis of different methods are put forward, and implications for commonly used hydraulic modelling packages are discussed
The aim of this study was to investigate the variation of channel bed roughness in two rivers, as im...
Although there have been much research done on Manning’s roughness coefficient, n in the United Sta...
Although Manning's roughness coefficient is known to vary with river stage, information on this aspe...
Although Manning's roughness coefficient is known to vary with river stage, information on this aspe...
In this experimental study the Manning’s roughness coefficient, n, is investigated in steady-uniform...
Quantifying hydraulic roughness coefficients is commonly required in order to calculate flow rate in...
Coefficients of roughness, n are characterized as parameters representing the channel roughness and ...
This paper reviews the applicability of nine selected expressions in determining the equivalent valu...
As a result of the rapid growth of water asset projects and pressure-driven design work throughout t...
AbstractEntropy model application to river presents relevant aspects for theoretical and practical i...
Determination of immeasurable parameter, the Manning’s roughness coefficient, is a complex problem o...
In this experimental study the Manning roughness coefficient n is examined, through a considerable n...
The aim of this study was to investigate the variation of channel bed roughness in two rivers, as im...
In this experimental study the Manning roughness coefficient n is examined, through a considerable n...
The aim of this study was to investigate the variation of channel bed roughness in two rivers, as im...
The aim of this study was to investigate the variation of channel bed roughness in two rivers, as im...
Although there have been much research done on Manning’s roughness coefficient, n in the United Sta...
Although Manning's roughness coefficient is known to vary with river stage, information on this aspe...
Although Manning's roughness coefficient is known to vary with river stage, information on this aspe...
In this experimental study the Manning’s roughness coefficient, n, is investigated in steady-uniform...
Quantifying hydraulic roughness coefficients is commonly required in order to calculate flow rate in...
Coefficients of roughness, n are characterized as parameters representing the channel roughness and ...
This paper reviews the applicability of nine selected expressions in determining the equivalent valu...
As a result of the rapid growth of water asset projects and pressure-driven design work throughout t...
AbstractEntropy model application to river presents relevant aspects for theoretical and practical i...
Determination of immeasurable parameter, the Manning’s roughness coefficient, is a complex problem o...
In this experimental study the Manning roughness coefficient n is examined, through a considerable n...
The aim of this study was to investigate the variation of channel bed roughness in two rivers, as im...
In this experimental study the Manning roughness coefficient n is examined, through a considerable n...
The aim of this study was to investigate the variation of channel bed roughness in two rivers, as im...
The aim of this study was to investigate the variation of channel bed roughness in two rivers, as im...
Although there have been much research done on Manning’s roughness coefficient, n in the United Sta...
Although Manning's roughness coefficient is known to vary with river stage, information on this aspe...