Purpose: To investigate the preferred and actual participation levels of colorectal cancer patients and their families in treatment decision-making. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted using a questionnaire administered to colorectal cancer patients hospitalized in the general surgical wards in two of the upper first-class hospitals in Beijing between February and July 2013. Results: A total of 113 questionnaires were analyzed. For the families of colorectal cancer patients, the concordance rate of their preferred and actual participation levels in treatment decision-making was 60.2% and 62.8% for the patients themselves. Patients with stoma and male patients preferred a passive role compared to those without stoma and female pa...
Purpose: The aims of this study were to 1) describe preferred and experienced roles in treatment dec...
Background: Establishing trust between a patient and his or her surgeon is of paramount importance. ...
Context: Rectal cancer treatment decisions involve tradeoffs between outcomes like living with a p...
AbstractPurposeTo investigate the preferred and actual participation levels of colorectal cancer pat...
Objectives: To design and administer an attitude rating scale, exploring colorectal cancer patien...
Aim. The aim of this study was to explore views on patient participation in decision making, as desc...
Objectives: To explore patient views on participation in treatment, physical care and psychological ...
PURPOSE: Clinicians often make decisions for their patients, despite evidence that suggests that cor...
The views of bowel cancer patients towards treatment decision‐making and the extent to which they pa...
Objectives To determine which aspects of the treatment decision process, therapy and outcomes are mo...
Objectives: To determine which aspects of the treatment decision process, therapy and outcomes are m...
Abstract Background The most common and severe type of nosocomial infection in patients with colorec...
The main aim of this thesis was to investigate preferences for participating in treatment decision-m...
Abstract Background Colorectal cancer is the third le...
Background Quality cancer care necessitates opportunities for patient participation, supposedly reco...
Purpose: The aims of this study were to 1) describe preferred and experienced roles in treatment dec...
Background: Establishing trust between a patient and his or her surgeon is of paramount importance. ...
Context: Rectal cancer treatment decisions involve tradeoffs between outcomes like living with a p...
AbstractPurposeTo investigate the preferred and actual participation levels of colorectal cancer pat...
Objectives: To design and administer an attitude rating scale, exploring colorectal cancer patien...
Aim. The aim of this study was to explore views on patient participation in decision making, as desc...
Objectives: To explore patient views on participation in treatment, physical care and psychological ...
PURPOSE: Clinicians often make decisions for their patients, despite evidence that suggests that cor...
The views of bowel cancer patients towards treatment decision‐making and the extent to which they pa...
Objectives To determine which aspects of the treatment decision process, therapy and outcomes are mo...
Objectives: To determine which aspects of the treatment decision process, therapy and outcomes are m...
Abstract Background The most common and severe type of nosocomial infection in patients with colorec...
The main aim of this thesis was to investigate preferences for participating in treatment decision-m...
Abstract Background Colorectal cancer is the third le...
Background Quality cancer care necessitates opportunities for patient participation, supposedly reco...
Purpose: The aims of this study were to 1) describe preferred and experienced roles in treatment dec...
Background: Establishing trust between a patient and his or her surgeon is of paramount importance. ...
Context: Rectal cancer treatment decisions involve tradeoffs between outcomes like living with a p...