My work attempts to identify the reasons behind the dialogue between theology and science, pointing out the difficulties of such a dialogue and the framework that appear under the conditions of the possibility of this dialogue. According to the author, the truths of science and the truths of theology belong to different dimensions and cannot collide if the specificity of the knowledge domains is observed. Science has as its object what we call physical world, whereas theology has as its object the metaphysical world, the world of values and of the meanings of existence in relation with transcendence. The arguments we bring lead to the idea of this dialogue being possible under the conditions of observing epistemic competences an...
The author advocates for the mediating role of philosophy in the dialogues between science and theol...
Being in its totality constitutes the domain of philosophy. Truth and beauty are transcendental prop...
Religious belief is often perceived as being in conflict with science—but does it have to be? Not us...
The misunderstandings which have existed concerning the relationship between science and theology ha...
Science and Theology: Befriending Each Other Epistemically The author wants to indicate the need fo...
Any dialogue between science and religion is a difficult one. The fundamental reason for this is tha...
Many today’s scientists think that religion can never come to terms with science. In sharp contrast ...
The relationship between science and religion is largely conceptualized within two particular paradi...
By engaging key questions, such as the existence of God, and the relationship between God and the wo...
The paper, drawing on ancient ideals of knowledge: pure versus practical, argues that natural scienc...
https://brasiliensis.cerm.org.br/index.php/brasiliensis/article/view/60/version/60 The influence of...
Is it rational for scientifically trained individuals to believe in God, and accept controversial th...
International audienceMany present day scientists think that religion can never come to terms with s...
According to a popular view science and theology are incompatible: non-overlapping magisteria, in te...
Ce travail en théologie a pour objet d'étudier la relation entre science et théologie, considérées c...
The author advocates for the mediating role of philosophy in the dialogues between science and theol...
Being in its totality constitutes the domain of philosophy. Truth and beauty are transcendental prop...
Religious belief is often perceived as being in conflict with science—but does it have to be? Not us...
The misunderstandings which have existed concerning the relationship between science and theology ha...
Science and Theology: Befriending Each Other Epistemically The author wants to indicate the need fo...
Any dialogue between science and religion is a difficult one. The fundamental reason for this is tha...
Many today’s scientists think that religion can never come to terms with science. In sharp contrast ...
The relationship between science and religion is largely conceptualized within two particular paradi...
By engaging key questions, such as the existence of God, and the relationship between God and the wo...
The paper, drawing on ancient ideals of knowledge: pure versus practical, argues that natural scienc...
https://brasiliensis.cerm.org.br/index.php/brasiliensis/article/view/60/version/60 The influence of...
Is it rational for scientifically trained individuals to believe in God, and accept controversial th...
International audienceMany present day scientists think that religion can never come to terms with s...
According to a popular view science and theology are incompatible: non-overlapping magisteria, in te...
Ce travail en théologie a pour objet d'étudier la relation entre science et théologie, considérées c...
The author advocates for the mediating role of philosophy in the dialogues between science and theol...
Being in its totality constitutes the domain of philosophy. Truth and beauty are transcendental prop...
Religious belief is often perceived as being in conflict with science—but does it have to be? Not us...