VIOLENCE IN SOCIETY

The recent interest in the sociology of violence has\ud arisen at the same time that western societies are being\ud urged to consider the profound social crisis provoked by\ud global financial turmoil. Social changes demand the evolution\ud of sociological practices.\ud The analysis herein proposed, based on the studies\ud of M. Wieviorka, La Violence (2005), and of R. Collins,\ud Violence: A Micro-sociological Theory (2008), concludes\ud that violence is subject to sociological treatments centered\ud on the aggressors, on the struggles for power and on\ud male gender. There is a lack of connection between practical\ud proposals for violence prevention and the sociology\ud of violence. It is accepted that violence as a subject\ud of study has the potential, as well as the theoretical and\ud social centrality, to promote the debate necessary to bring\ud social theory up to date. This process is more likely to occur\ud in periods of social transformation, when sociology\ud is open to considering subjects that are still taboo in its\ud study of violence, such as the female gender and the state.\ud The rise of the sociology of violence confronts us with\ud a dilemma. We can either collaborate with the construction\ud of a sub discipline that reproduces the limitations\ud and taboos of current social theory, or we can use the fact\ud that violence has become a “hot topic” as an opportunity\ud to open sociology to themes that are taboo in social theory\ud (such as the vital and harmonious character of the\ud biological aspects of social mechanisms or the normative\ud aspects of social settings)