DEMOKRASI DI INDONESIA Antara Pembatasan dan Kebebasan Beragama

<p>Democracy has been understood differently. Law no.1/PNPS/1965 which<br />is previously recognized as protection of religious followers is recognized as<br />limitation that denied principle of democracy recently. The polemic of religious<br />freedom ended with proposal of judicial review on law no.1/PNPS/1965 proposed</p><p>by some group of societies. This proposal, finally, is rejected by prime<br />court. This rejection can be corrected since UUD 1945 follows an expressive<br />relativism on religious freedom. Because of the existence of ambiguous words<br />in such law, revision is really needed so that there will be a clear explanation<br />related to who has the authority to determine whether certain religious teaching<br />is wrong or not. It is important to solve the problematic matters faced by government and certain religious groups.</p><p><strong>Keywords</strong> : demokrasi, relativisme