In this paper the thesis is argued that there is no need for a special legal logic to deal with the defeasibility of legal arguments. An important argument for this thesis is that legal judgements ask for a complete justification and that such a complete justification requires a deductively valid argument. © 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers
Two main approaches to understand juristic logic are analyzed. In accordance with the first approach...
There instance where the judge (on proper objection) is called upon to rule that certain arguments a...
The main claim of this paper is that reasoning with rules, especially rules of law, is different fro...
none1noThis chapter provides an analysis of defeasible legal reasoning as argumentation. It first pr...
This paper discusses the functions of deductive justification in ideal reconstructions of judicial r...
The paper consists of three parts. In the first part five kinds of defeasibility are distinguished t...
Logical argument is one of the strongest kinds of argument, for it can be applied to any domain. In ...
none2siThis article reviews legal applications of logic, with a particularly marked concern for logi...
One of the most crucial questions in the philosophy of law deals with the very nature of legal reaso...
This article reviews legal applications of logic, with a particularly marked concern for logical mod...
When a legal rule requires us to drive on the right, notarize our wills, or refrain from selling boo...
The present work will investigate in the most important aspects of the logic of the reasonable, in w...
In this short paper, I argue that legal philosophers ought to focus more than they have done so far ...
none3siThis chapter is a light-weighted overview of significant contributions to legal logic insofar...
Due to the fact that some fundamental laws of logic (such as the principles of non-contradiction and...
Two main approaches to understand juristic logic are analyzed. In accordance with the first approach...
There instance where the judge (on proper objection) is called upon to rule that certain arguments a...
The main claim of this paper is that reasoning with rules, especially rules of law, is different fro...
none1noThis chapter provides an analysis of defeasible legal reasoning as argumentation. It first pr...
This paper discusses the functions of deductive justification in ideal reconstructions of judicial r...
The paper consists of three parts. In the first part five kinds of defeasibility are distinguished t...
Logical argument is one of the strongest kinds of argument, for it can be applied to any domain. In ...
none2siThis article reviews legal applications of logic, with a particularly marked concern for logi...
One of the most crucial questions in the philosophy of law deals with the very nature of legal reaso...
This article reviews legal applications of logic, with a particularly marked concern for logical mod...
When a legal rule requires us to drive on the right, notarize our wills, or refrain from selling boo...
The present work will investigate in the most important aspects of the logic of the reasonable, in w...
In this short paper, I argue that legal philosophers ought to focus more than they have done so far ...
none3siThis chapter is a light-weighted overview of significant contributions to legal logic insofar...
Due to the fact that some fundamental laws of logic (such as the principles of non-contradiction and...
Two main approaches to understand juristic logic are analyzed. In accordance with the first approach...
There instance where the judge (on proper objection) is called upon to rule that certain arguments a...
The main claim of this paper is that reasoning with rules, especially rules of law, is different fro...
DOI
Add to ORKG