We respond to three commentaries on our discussion article on different conceptions of test score reliability. First, we discuss the use of standard errors for reliability estimates. Second, we discuss the desirability not to confuse issues pertaining to the dimensionality of the test data (closely related to construct validity) and the degree to which measurement values are repeatable under the same circumstances (i.e., the reliability issue). Third, we discuss a new reliability estimation method that is almost unbiased irrespective of the dimensionality of the test data
We discuss reliability definitions from the perspectives of classical test theory, factor analysis, ...
Test authors report sample reliability values but rarely consider the sampling error and related con...
The reliability of a test score is usually underestimated and the deflation may be profound, 0.40–0....
We respond to three commentaries on our discussion article on different conceptions of test score re...
The purpose of this article is to help researchers avoid common pitfalls associated with reliability...
For many researchers, the literature of reliability coefficients seems bewildering although the meth...
This article helps researchers avoid common pitfalls associated with reliability including incorrect...
This paper discusses the fact that reliability is about scores and not tests and how reliability lim...
Researchers consistently fail to report reliability estimates for data used in their studies. This l...
It is incorrect to say "the test is reliable " because reliability is a function not only ...
The present article addresses reliability issues in light of recent studies and debates focused on p...
Many researchers fail to understand that reliability is a function of scores, not tests. This paper ...
Background: Reproducibility concerns the degree to which repeated measurements provide similar resul...
The present article emphasizes that measurement issues must be explicitly considered even in studies...
Reliability describes the precision of a measurement. This contribution begins by defining the conce...
We discuss reliability definitions from the perspectives of classical test theory, factor analysis, ...
Test authors report sample reliability values but rarely consider the sampling error and related con...
The reliability of a test score is usually underestimated and the deflation may be profound, 0.40–0....
We respond to three commentaries on our discussion article on different conceptions of test score re...
The purpose of this article is to help researchers avoid common pitfalls associated with reliability...
For many researchers, the literature of reliability coefficients seems bewildering although the meth...
This article helps researchers avoid common pitfalls associated with reliability including incorrect...
This paper discusses the fact that reliability is about scores and not tests and how reliability lim...
Researchers consistently fail to report reliability estimates for data used in their studies. This l...
It is incorrect to say "the test is reliable " because reliability is a function not only ...
The present article addresses reliability issues in light of recent studies and debates focused on p...
Many researchers fail to understand that reliability is a function of scores, not tests. This paper ...
Background: Reproducibility concerns the degree to which repeated measurements provide similar resul...
The present article emphasizes that measurement issues must be explicitly considered even in studies...
Reliability describes the precision of a measurement. This contribution begins by defining the conce...
We discuss reliability definitions from the perspectives of classical test theory, factor analysis, ...
Test authors report sample reliability values but rarely consider the sampling error and related con...
The reliability of a test score is usually underestimated and the deflation may be profound, 0.40–0....