Combining art historical and technical perspectives, this paper examines Richard Hamilton’s 1965–6 reconstruction of Marcel Duchamp’s Large Glass and the wider repercussions that Hamilton’s actions have had on our understanding of replication and the idea of authorship. The dramatic history of the work is unpacked thoroughly and provides a platform for thinking about the precariousness of materials and meanings, and the slippages that occur when replicas become part of the story of a work, an artist and an institution
Perhaps no twentieth-century artist utilized puns and linguistic ambiguity with greater effect - and...
Reviewing Robert Morris’ 9 at Leo Castelli exhibition of December 1968, Max Kozloff used the terms v...
Thirty-seven years after the first Duchamp exhibit for the grand opening of the Centre Pompidou in 1...
Combining art historical and technical perspectives, this paper examines Richard Hamilton’s1965–6 re...
Holmes explains that Walter Ehrenberg had come to own most of the rights in The Large Glass, but sol...
The scope of the essay is limited by the ideas behind the mechanisation of desire as conceptualised ...
Departing from Duchamp’s advice in 1961 of finding the “com- mon factor” between the non-representat...
The production of fine art prints has a longstanding relationship with the collaborative print studi...
The purpose of this study was to determine whether The Large Glass was a negation of women for Marce...
"For more than half a century the British artist Richard Hamilton engaged in an extremely intense an...
This work intends to examine a work of art, specifically the Large Glass from Marcel Duchamp, based ...
The paper draws upon the relationship between artistic documentation and content over Marcel Duchamp...
In this paper I contrast two incidents in which contentious notions of authenticity were tested lega...
When thinking categorically about Marcel Duchamp\u27s art, one is confronted with an apparent parado...
Oil, varnish, lead foil, lead wire, and dust on glass plate mounted between two glass panels "Surely...
Perhaps no twentieth-century artist utilized puns and linguistic ambiguity with greater effect - and...
Reviewing Robert Morris’ 9 at Leo Castelli exhibition of December 1968, Max Kozloff used the terms v...
Thirty-seven years after the first Duchamp exhibit for the grand opening of the Centre Pompidou in 1...
Combining art historical and technical perspectives, this paper examines Richard Hamilton’s1965–6 re...
Holmes explains that Walter Ehrenberg had come to own most of the rights in The Large Glass, but sol...
The scope of the essay is limited by the ideas behind the mechanisation of desire as conceptualised ...
Departing from Duchamp’s advice in 1961 of finding the “com- mon factor” between the non-representat...
The production of fine art prints has a longstanding relationship with the collaborative print studi...
The purpose of this study was to determine whether The Large Glass was a negation of women for Marce...
"For more than half a century the British artist Richard Hamilton engaged in an extremely intense an...
This work intends to examine a work of art, specifically the Large Glass from Marcel Duchamp, based ...
The paper draws upon the relationship between artistic documentation and content over Marcel Duchamp...
In this paper I contrast two incidents in which contentious notions of authenticity were tested lega...
When thinking categorically about Marcel Duchamp\u27s art, one is confronted with an apparent parado...
Oil, varnish, lead foil, lead wire, and dust on glass plate mounted between two glass panels "Surely...
Perhaps no twentieth-century artist utilized puns and linguistic ambiguity with greater effect - and...
Reviewing Robert Morris’ 9 at Leo Castelli exhibition of December 1968, Max Kozloff used the terms v...
Thirty-seven years after the first Duchamp exhibit for the grand opening of the Centre Pompidou in 1...