AIMS – The principles of free trade and free circulation of services within the European Union have created pressures to make the strictly controlled European gambling markets more open. According to the Court of Justice of the European Union, restrictions on gambling are only allowed if they are justified in admissible terms of consumer protection, prevention of criminal activity and protection of public order. This study compares the gambling laws of two European societies, France and Finland, to analyse how their legal frames of gambling have been adjusted to these principles
This study fills a gap in gambling research by inquiring into the ways in which people make sense of...
Gambling is not a new societal phenomenon. Because of the special nature of the industry, it was exc...
This study examines how to institutional environment of gambling is currently in motion both in Euro...
AIMS - The principles of free trade and free circulation of services within the European Union have ...
The EU Member States in general have striven to comply with Court of Justice of the European Union r...
The purpose of this article is to compare the different regulatory approaches taken by Finland and t...
Finland and the Netherlands are both Member States of the European Union. They represent two differe...
A rapidly growing globalized and digitalized gambling industry has compelled European jurisdictions ...
Survey data from several countries indicate that public attitudes toward gambling and its deregulati...
Gambling and the national gambling markets has so far not been harmonised through any Community law ...
Abstract Background Gambling regulated through a state monopoly is often justified for reasons of pu...
Finland has one of the last fully monopolistic gambling sectors in Europe. Unlike in most Western Eu...
Why are gambling markets treated so differently to other markets? This apperently trivial question i...
Unlike in other Nordic countries, most of the electronic gambling machines (EGMs) are placed outside...
Finnish state monopolies have been in a state of change during the mid-2010s. This paper focuses on ...
This study fills a gap in gambling research by inquiring into the ways in which people make sense of...
Gambling is not a new societal phenomenon. Because of the special nature of the industry, it was exc...
This study examines how to institutional environment of gambling is currently in motion both in Euro...
AIMS - The principles of free trade and free circulation of services within the European Union have ...
The EU Member States in general have striven to comply with Court of Justice of the European Union r...
The purpose of this article is to compare the different regulatory approaches taken by Finland and t...
Finland and the Netherlands are both Member States of the European Union. They represent two differe...
A rapidly growing globalized and digitalized gambling industry has compelled European jurisdictions ...
Survey data from several countries indicate that public attitudes toward gambling and its deregulati...
Gambling and the national gambling markets has so far not been harmonised through any Community law ...
Abstract Background Gambling regulated through a state monopoly is often justified for reasons of pu...
Finland has one of the last fully monopolistic gambling sectors in Europe. Unlike in most Western Eu...
Why are gambling markets treated so differently to other markets? This apperently trivial question i...
Unlike in other Nordic countries, most of the electronic gambling machines (EGMs) are placed outside...
Finnish state monopolies have been in a state of change during the mid-2010s. This paper focuses on ...
This study fills a gap in gambling research by inquiring into the ways in which people make sense of...
Gambling is not a new societal phenomenon. Because of the special nature of the industry, it was exc...
This study examines how to institutional environment of gambling is currently in motion both in Euro...