The high-tech industry produces complex devices in which software plays an important role. Since these devices have been developed for many decades, an increasing part of the software can be classified as legacy which is difficult to maintain and to extend. To improve the maintainability of legacy components, domain specific languages (DSLs) provide promising perspectives. We present a DSL for creating configuration files that describe the topology of a fieldbus. This DSL improves the maintainability and extensibility of a legacy component. Compared to the current way-ofworking, the configuration files generated by the DSL are of higher quality due to the concise representation of DSL instances and additional validation checks. To raise the...
Domain Specific Languages (DSLs) are widely adopted to capitalize on business domain experiences. Co...
International audienceThe use of domain-specific languages (DSLs) has become a successful technique ...
Does the use of DSL tools improve the maintainability of language implementations compared to implem...
Contains fulltext : 181584.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access)DSM 2016: Pro...
To improve the design of a power control unit at Philips, two Domain Specific Languages (DSLs) have ...
This paper describes our experience using a functional language, Haskell, to build an embedded, doma...
Domain-specific languages (DSLs) are languages most suitable for a specific application domain. They...
Domain Specific Languages (DSLs) are small languages designed for use in a specific domain. DSLs typ...
A domain specific language (DSL) allows one to develop software for a particular application domain ...
Support for interoperability and interchangeability of software components which are part of a field...
Domain Specific Languages (DSLs) are small languages designed for use in a specific domain. DSLs typ...
So-called little, or domain-specific languages (DSLs), have the potential to make software maintenan...
Abstract: Domain-Specific Languages (DSLs) are claimed to increase productiv-ity, while reducing the...
AbstractDomain-specific languages (DSLs) are being increasingly used as a realistic approach to addr...
Domain-Specific Languages (DSLs) are programming language aimed at a particular problem domain, e.g....
Domain Specific Languages (DSLs) are widely adopted to capitalize on business domain experiences. Co...
International audienceThe use of domain-specific languages (DSLs) has become a successful technique ...
Does the use of DSL tools improve the maintainability of language implementations compared to implem...
Contains fulltext : 181584.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access)DSM 2016: Pro...
To improve the design of a power control unit at Philips, two Domain Specific Languages (DSLs) have ...
This paper describes our experience using a functional language, Haskell, to build an embedded, doma...
Domain-specific languages (DSLs) are languages most suitable for a specific application domain. They...
Domain Specific Languages (DSLs) are small languages designed for use in a specific domain. DSLs typ...
A domain specific language (DSL) allows one to develop software for a particular application domain ...
Support for interoperability and interchangeability of software components which are part of a field...
Domain Specific Languages (DSLs) are small languages designed for use in a specific domain. DSLs typ...
So-called little, or domain-specific languages (DSLs), have the potential to make software maintenan...
Abstract: Domain-Specific Languages (DSLs) are claimed to increase productiv-ity, while reducing the...
AbstractDomain-specific languages (DSLs) are being increasingly used as a realistic approach to addr...
Domain-Specific Languages (DSLs) are programming language aimed at a particular problem domain, e.g....
Domain Specific Languages (DSLs) are widely adopted to capitalize on business domain experiences. Co...
International audienceThe use of domain-specific languages (DSLs) has become a successful technique ...
Does the use of DSL tools improve the maintainability of language implementations compared to implem...