Sharing code is becoming increasingly important in the wake of Open Science. In this review I describe and compare two popular code-sharing utilities, GitHub and Open Science Framework (OSF). GitHub is a mature, industry-standard tool but lacks focus towards researchers. In comparison, OSF offers a one-stop solution for researchers but a lot of functionality is still under development. I conclude by listing alternative lesser-known tools for code and materials sharing
This poster was presented at Reproducibility, Replicability and Trust in Science Conference, 7th Sep...
<p>Open Science is a broad movement looking beyond Open Access to publish openly and share scientifi...
Abstract Background Reproducibility is the hallmark of good science. Maintaining a high degree of tr...
Sharing code is becoming increasingly important in the wake of Open Science. In this review I descri...
The first Open Science Indicators Dataset released in December 2022 by the Public Library of Science...
I briefly describe three themes that help maximize the benefits of an open science approach towards ...
Ensuring reproducibility is one of the main goals of open science. To achieve reproducibility of sci...
Whilst many funders and publishers require or encourage researchers to share data underlying publica...
The existing code-based program implemented in GitHub portal provides a great tool for scientists an...
In 2017, a European dialogue process led to the development of the so-called “Open Science Career As...
In the ongoing debate over open data-sharing, two practical concerns re- garding costs in implementi...
Abstract. Software is the backbone of scientific computing. Yet, while we regularly publish detailed...
Abstract—Researchers are currently drawn to study projects hosted on GitHub due to its popularity, e...
Abstract—Researchers are currently drawn to study projects hosted on GitHub due to its popularity, e...
Bioinformatics is a broad discipline in which one common denominator is the need to produce and/or u...
This poster was presented at Reproducibility, Replicability and Trust in Science Conference, 7th Sep...
<p>Open Science is a broad movement looking beyond Open Access to publish openly and share scientifi...
Abstract Background Reproducibility is the hallmark of good science. Maintaining a high degree of tr...
Sharing code is becoming increasingly important in the wake of Open Science. In this review I descri...
The first Open Science Indicators Dataset released in December 2022 by the Public Library of Science...
I briefly describe three themes that help maximize the benefits of an open science approach towards ...
Ensuring reproducibility is one of the main goals of open science. To achieve reproducibility of sci...
Whilst many funders and publishers require or encourage researchers to share data underlying publica...
The existing code-based program implemented in GitHub portal provides a great tool for scientists an...
In 2017, a European dialogue process led to the development of the so-called “Open Science Career As...
In the ongoing debate over open data-sharing, two practical concerns re- garding costs in implementi...
Abstract. Software is the backbone of scientific computing. Yet, while we regularly publish detailed...
Abstract—Researchers are currently drawn to study projects hosted on GitHub due to its popularity, e...
Abstract—Researchers are currently drawn to study projects hosted on GitHub due to its popularity, e...
Bioinformatics is a broad discipline in which one common denominator is the need to produce and/or u...
This poster was presented at Reproducibility, Replicability and Trust in Science Conference, 7th Sep...
<p>Open Science is a broad movement looking beyond Open Access to publish openly and share scientifi...
Abstract Background Reproducibility is the hallmark of good science. Maintaining a high degree of tr...