Nobel Prizes are commonly seen to be among the most prestigious achievements of our times. Based on mining several million citations, we quantitatively analyze the processes driving paradigm shifts in science. We find that groundbreaking discoveries of Nobel Prize Laureates and other famous scientists are not only acknowledged by many citations of their landmark papers. Surprisingly, they also boost the citation rates of their previous publications. Given that innovations must outcompete the rich-gets-richer effect for scientific citations, it turns out that they can make their way only through citation cascades. A quantitative analysis reveals how and why they happen. Science appears to behave like a self-organized critical system, in whic...
Since the 1950s, citation number or “impact” has been the dominant metric by which science is quanti...
We examine whether and when star scientist collaborations produce indirect peer effects. We theorize...
<p> Each panel displays the time histories of four variables: the boost factor ...
Nobel Prizes are commonly seen to be among the most prestigious achievements of our times. Based on ...
Nobel Prizes are commonly seen to be among the most prestigious achievements of our times. Based on ...
Nobel Prizes are commonly seen to be among the most prestigious achievements of our times. Based on ...
In all of science, the authors of publications depend on the knowledge presented by the previous pub...
This paper introduces the perspective of dynamic citation process to identify citation patterns of s...
<p>Temporal dependence of for Nobel Laureates [here for (a) Mario R. Capecc...
Scientific production is steadily growing, exhibiting 4% annual growth in publications and 1.8% annu...
Using citation data of 557 Nobel prize winning papers and the same number of their non-prize winning...
We aimed to assess whether Nobel prizes (widely considered the most prestigious award in science) ar...
We aimed to assess whether Nobel prizes (widely considered the most prestigious award in science) ar...
Scientific production is steadily growing, exhibiting 4% annual growth in publications and 1.8% annu...
<p>Typical citation trajectories of papers, here for Nobel Prize Laureate John ...
Since the 1950s, citation number or “impact” has been the dominant metric by which science is quanti...
We examine whether and when star scientist collaborations produce indirect peer effects. We theorize...
<p> Each panel displays the time histories of four variables: the boost factor ...
Nobel Prizes are commonly seen to be among the most prestigious achievements of our times. Based on ...
Nobel Prizes are commonly seen to be among the most prestigious achievements of our times. Based on ...
Nobel Prizes are commonly seen to be among the most prestigious achievements of our times. Based on ...
In all of science, the authors of publications depend on the knowledge presented by the previous pub...
This paper introduces the perspective of dynamic citation process to identify citation patterns of s...
<p>Temporal dependence of for Nobel Laureates [here for (a) Mario R. Capecc...
Scientific production is steadily growing, exhibiting 4% annual growth in publications and 1.8% annu...
Using citation data of 557 Nobel prize winning papers and the same number of their non-prize winning...
We aimed to assess whether Nobel prizes (widely considered the most prestigious award in science) ar...
We aimed to assess whether Nobel prizes (widely considered the most prestigious award in science) ar...
Scientific production is steadily growing, exhibiting 4% annual growth in publications and 1.8% annu...
<p>Typical citation trajectories of papers, here for Nobel Prize Laureate John ...
Since the 1950s, citation number or “impact” has been the dominant metric by which science is quanti...
We examine whether and when star scientist collaborations produce indirect peer effects. We theorize...
<p> Each panel displays the time histories of four variables: the boost factor ...