The article examines the Roman origin and historical development of "causa" as an essential requirement of the contracts, as well as its adoption in the majority of the national legislations belonging to the French legal family. Moreover, the article analyzes what has become to be known as the functional equivalent of causa in the English law – the doctrine of consideration and examines the correlation between them. In the end, the latest tendencies in codifying the European civil law with respect to causa and consideration are being critically discussed
The purpose of this thesis is to examine, from a comparative perspective, the legal treatment of sti...
The phrase “who says contractual, says justice” or “qui dit contractuel dit juste” does not fully ex...
Straipsnyje analizuojama, kokia koncepcinė idėja šiuolaikinėje teisėje pagrindžia duotų pažadų teisi...
Although the common law is the general basis of the law of this country and of the law of the Britis...
In the case of Mtembre v. Webster, decided recently (19o4) in the Supreme Court of Cape Colony, Sout...
The causa of a contractual obligation is one of the most obscure and controver-sial institutes of th...
The doctrine of consideration is widely regarded as one of the most problematic contract law doctrin...
This paper examines the distinct roles, which the Roman doctrine of ‘causa’ acquired in English and ...
This article explores the concept of consideration in contract law from a comparative perspective, l...
Causa is a requirement for the validity of contracts under Bello´s Civil Code. One of the doctrinal ...
The motive is a key concept of French Civil Law that goes beyond the limits of the contracts validit...
A practical comparison between the two main legal system families can profit from some unique instan...
Decodification has a significant impact not only on legislation, but on legal transactions and juris...
The mention of the words αἴτιον and αἰτία is very frequent inside the precepts that refer to the doc...
The phrase “who says contractual, says justice” (qui dit contractuel dit juste) does not fully expre...
The purpose of this thesis is to examine, from a comparative perspective, the legal treatment of sti...
The phrase “who says contractual, says justice” or “qui dit contractuel dit juste” does not fully ex...
Straipsnyje analizuojama, kokia koncepcinė idėja šiuolaikinėje teisėje pagrindžia duotų pažadų teisi...
Although the common law is the general basis of the law of this country and of the law of the Britis...
In the case of Mtembre v. Webster, decided recently (19o4) in the Supreme Court of Cape Colony, Sout...
The causa of a contractual obligation is one of the most obscure and controver-sial institutes of th...
The doctrine of consideration is widely regarded as one of the most problematic contract law doctrin...
This paper examines the distinct roles, which the Roman doctrine of ‘causa’ acquired in English and ...
This article explores the concept of consideration in contract law from a comparative perspective, l...
Causa is a requirement for the validity of contracts under Bello´s Civil Code. One of the doctrinal ...
The motive is a key concept of French Civil Law that goes beyond the limits of the contracts validit...
A practical comparison between the two main legal system families can profit from some unique instan...
Decodification has a significant impact not only on legislation, but on legal transactions and juris...
The mention of the words αἴτιον and αἰτία is very frequent inside the precepts that refer to the doc...
The phrase “who says contractual, says justice” (qui dit contractuel dit juste) does not fully expre...
The purpose of this thesis is to examine, from a comparative perspective, the legal treatment of sti...
The phrase “who says contractual, says justice” or “qui dit contractuel dit juste” does not fully ex...
Straipsnyje analizuojama, kokia koncepcinė idėja šiuolaikinėje teisėje pagrindžia duotų pažadų teisi...