Central to research funding are grant proposals that researchers send in to potential funders for review, in the hope of approval. A survey of policies at major research funders found that there is room for more transparency in the process of grant review, which would strengthen the case for the efficiency of public spending on research. On that basis, debate was invited on which transparency measures should be implemented and how, with some concrete suggestions at hand. The present article adds to this discussion by providing further context from the literature, along with considerations on the effect size of the proposed measures. The article then explores the option of opening to the public key components of the process, makes the case f...
This review of the transparency literature has shown the evolution of the field through the prism of...
Reproducibility in science is continuing to receive a lot of attention with more and more highly cit...
Transparency is hot topic in scholarly communications, with compelling arguments both for and agains...
Central to research funding are grant proposals that researchers send in to potential funders for re...
In this issue, Gurwitz et al. [1] (subsequently GMK) report on a survey of transparency at major fun...
This is a manuscript submitted to PLOS Biology on November 4, 2014 as a commentary on an accepted ma...
The Legitimacy of Peer Reviewing Transparency Policies at Funding Agencies Incremental Perspective...
Although research funders wield enormous power over knowledge production and science policy, their d...
This paper presents an exploration of the concept of research transparency. The policy context is de...
This paper examines argues that while two distinct perspectives characterize the foundations of the ...
This toolkit explores how transparency can strengthen credibility, improve grantee relationships, fa...
This paper examines argues that while two distinct perspectives characterize the foundations of the ...
The advent of the Open Science paradigm has led to new interdependencies between the funding of rese...
Proving public value can be an especially difficult task when high-profile cases of fraud in social ...
This review of the transparency literature has shown the evolution of the field through the prism of...
This review of the transparency literature has shown the evolution of the field through the prism of...
Reproducibility in science is continuing to receive a lot of attention with more and more highly cit...
Transparency is hot topic in scholarly communications, with compelling arguments both for and agains...
Central to research funding are grant proposals that researchers send in to potential funders for re...
In this issue, Gurwitz et al. [1] (subsequently GMK) report on a survey of transparency at major fun...
This is a manuscript submitted to PLOS Biology on November 4, 2014 as a commentary on an accepted ma...
The Legitimacy of Peer Reviewing Transparency Policies at Funding Agencies Incremental Perspective...
Although research funders wield enormous power over knowledge production and science policy, their d...
This paper presents an exploration of the concept of research transparency. The policy context is de...
This paper examines argues that while two distinct perspectives characterize the foundations of the ...
This toolkit explores how transparency can strengthen credibility, improve grantee relationships, fa...
This paper examines argues that while two distinct perspectives characterize the foundations of the ...
The advent of the Open Science paradigm has led to new interdependencies between the funding of rese...
Proving public value can be an especially difficult task when high-profile cases of fraud in social ...
This review of the transparency literature has shown the evolution of the field through the prism of...
This review of the transparency literature has shown the evolution of the field through the prism of...
Reproducibility in science is continuing to receive a lot of attention with more and more highly cit...
Transparency is hot topic in scholarly communications, with compelling arguments both for and agains...