BACKGROUND: GRADE was developed to address shortcomings of tools to rate the quality of a body of evidence. While much has been published about GRADE, there are few empirical and systematic evaluations. OBJECTIVE: To assess GRADE for systematic reviews (SRs) in terms of inter-rater agreement and identify areas of uncertainty. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, descriptive study. METHODS: We applied GRADE to three SRs (n = 48, 66, and 75 studies, respectively) with 29 comparisons and 12 outcomes overall. Two reviewers graded evidence independently for outcomes deemed clinically important a priori. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using kappas for four main domains (risk of bias, consistency, directness, and precision) and overall quality of eviden...
Main concepts : The Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approa...
Objectives: One recommended use of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evalu...
Artículo de publicación ISIObjective: We evaluated the inter-rater reliability (IRR) of assessing th...
GRADE was developed to address shortcomings of tools to rate the quality of a body of evidence. Whil...
Objectives The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Gro...
Background: The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach ...
AbstractObjectivesThe Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Work...
One of the most widely used tools for assessing and communicating scienti c uncertainty is Grading o...
To explore user perspectives on applying the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and ...
OBJECTIVES To appraise the quality of evidence in systematic reviews (SRs) within the Cochrane Da...
OBJECTIVES To assess the use of quality assessment tools among a cross-section of systematic revi...
Guideline panels need to process a sizeable amount of information to issue a decision on whether to ...
Rationale: Methodological quality of systematic reviews (SRs) remains an area of concern with no con...
This article is the first of a series providing guidance for use of the Grading of Recommendations A...
Systematic reviews have played an increasingly important role in health promotion in recent years. Y...
Main concepts : The Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approa...
Objectives: One recommended use of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evalu...
Artículo de publicación ISIObjective: We evaluated the inter-rater reliability (IRR) of assessing th...
GRADE was developed to address shortcomings of tools to rate the quality of a body of evidence. Whil...
Objectives The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Gro...
Background: The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach ...
AbstractObjectivesThe Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Work...
One of the most widely used tools for assessing and communicating scienti c uncertainty is Grading o...
To explore user perspectives on applying the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and ...
OBJECTIVES To appraise the quality of evidence in systematic reviews (SRs) within the Cochrane Da...
OBJECTIVES To assess the use of quality assessment tools among a cross-section of systematic revi...
Guideline panels need to process a sizeable amount of information to issue a decision on whether to ...
Rationale: Methodological quality of systematic reviews (SRs) remains an area of concern with no con...
This article is the first of a series providing guidance for use of the Grading of Recommendations A...
Systematic reviews have played an increasingly important role in health promotion in recent years. Y...
Main concepts : The Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approa...
Objectives: One recommended use of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evalu...
Artículo de publicación ISIObjective: We evaluated the inter-rater reliability (IRR) of assessing th...