Soul Chariots in Indian and Greek Thought: Polygenesis or Diffusion?

The intriguing similarity between the allegories of the soul chariot in Plato\u2019s Ph\ue6drus and in the Ka\u1e6dha Upani\u1e63ad has been pointed out \u2014 if not thoroughly investigated \u2014 by several scholars, accompanied with varying assessments, largely dependent on each individual scholar\u2019s assumptions concerning the bare possibility or the degree of likelihood of contacts and influences between early Greek and Indian thought, the significance (or otherwise) of the intercultural comparative endeavour, or, indeed, the methodological soundness of even positing the question, in the almost complete absence of pertinent historical documentation. Because assessments are to such a great extent influenced by theoretical assumptions, the paper will start with some methodological considerations in order to define the grounds, scope and limits of the attempted comparison, also drawing on the methodological discourses of other related fields, like mythology and folklore. A review of the relevant texts of the Ph\ue6drus and the Ka\u1e6dhopani\u1e63ad will come next, setting out both the congruencies and the discrepancies in the treatment of the chariot allegory. A detailed survey of kindred passages in both literary traditions (which I have presented elsewhere) lies outside the purview of this paper, but a summary reference to its results will help substantiate the contention that the allegory of the soul chariot is integral to upani\u1e63adic thought in a way that is unparalleled in Greek thought, thus supporting the conjecture of diffusion in a westward direction. Finally, the paper will briefly discuss what I regard as the paramount difference \u2014 i.e. the conspicuous absence of the idle passenger in the Ph\ue6drus allegory vs. his centrality to the allegory of the Ka\u1e6dha \u2014 and its significance as a theoretical watershed between Upani\u1e63ad-based Indian and Plato-influenced Greek philosophy