Add to ORKGThe Nordic languages have non-canonical passive constructions with GET + past participle, as in the Swedish examples in (1).[1] These examples have in common that the subject of GET is not (necessarily) interpreted as the agent of the participial event. As in canonical passives, the external argument of the participial verb is demoted or implicit in GET-passives. [...
\citet{Holmberg2002} proposes an account for the variation concerning expletives, participial agreem...
While some traditional grammarians claim that get passive is the alternative colloquial of be passiv...
We report evidence from syntactic priming showing that speakers produce more be-passive responses af...
This paper gives an account of the event and argument structure of past particles, and the linking b...
In this paper, we argue that, in addition to non-agreeing passives, Finnish has even an agreeing pas...
In many languages, a passive-like meaning may be obtained through a non-canonical passive constructi...
This thesis concerns the syntactic-semantic development of the perfect tense from a construction wit...
Among the present-day Scandinavian languages, only Danish and possibly Faroese have a split auxiliar...
The present thesis studies the verb get in the function of the passive auxiliary. The theoretical pa...
Passives with expletive subjects seem to be possible in all Nordic dialects, but there is variation ...
In many languages, a passive-like meaning may be obtained through a noncanonical passive constructio...
The characteristics commonly attributed to central get-passives in the relevant literature include t...
This thesis investigates the grammatical constructions of be-and get-passives and their usage by Swe...
The focus of this thesis is the ergative behavior of the verb get in the passive construction in Eng...
This thesis argues that passives in English and Norwegian can be explained by a casetheoretic approa...
\citet{Holmberg2002} proposes an account for the variation concerning expletives, participial agreem...
While some traditional grammarians claim that get passive is the alternative colloquial of be passiv...
We report evidence from syntactic priming showing that speakers produce more be-passive responses af...
This paper gives an account of the event and argument structure of past particles, and the linking b...
In this paper, we argue that, in addition to non-agreeing passives, Finnish has even an agreeing pas...
In many languages, a passive-like meaning may be obtained through a non-canonical passive constructi...
This thesis concerns the syntactic-semantic development of the perfect tense from a construction wit...
Among the present-day Scandinavian languages, only Danish and possibly Faroese have a split auxiliar...
The present thesis studies the verb get in the function of the passive auxiliary. The theoretical pa...
Passives with expletive subjects seem to be possible in all Nordic dialects, but there is variation ...
In many languages, a passive-like meaning may be obtained through a noncanonical passive constructio...
The characteristics commonly attributed to central get-passives in the relevant literature include t...
This thesis investigates the grammatical constructions of be-and get-passives and their usage by Swe...
The focus of this thesis is the ergative behavior of the verb get in the passive construction in Eng...
This thesis argues that passives in English and Norwegian can be explained by a casetheoretic approa...
\citet{Holmberg2002} proposes an account for the variation concerning expletives, participial agreem...
While some traditional grammarians claim that get passive is the alternative colloquial of be passiv...
We report evidence from syntactic priming showing that speakers produce more be-passive responses af...