We propose a dynamic epistemic framework for the verification of security protocols. First, we introduce a dynamic epistemic logic equipped with iteration and cryptographic supplements in which we can formalize and check (epistemic) requirements of security protocols. On top of this, we give a general guide how to go from a protocol specification to its representation in our framework. We demonstrate this by checking requirements of a simplified version of a protocol for confidential message comparison
Anonymity is not a trace-based property, therefore traditional model checkers are not directly able ...
Anonymity is not a trace-based property, therefore traditional model checkers are not directly able ...
AbstractAnonymity is not a trace-based property, therefore traditional model checkers are not direct...
Security properties naturally combine temporal aspects of protocols with aspects of knowledge of the...
Abstract. Security properties naturally combine temporal aspects of protocols with aspects of knowle...
Security properties naturally combine temporal aspects of protocols with aspects of knowledge of the...
Security properties naturally combine temporal aspects of protocols with aspects of knowledge of the...
We propose a unifying framework for formal specification and verification of both epistemic and beha...
We propose a unifying framework for formal specification and verification of both epistemic and beha...
This dissertation presents a logical investigation of epistemic protocols, focussing on protocol-dyn...
Anonymity is not a trace-based property, therefore traditional model checkers are not directly able ...
Anonymity is not a trace-based property, therefore traditional model checkers are not directly able ...
Anonymity is not a trace-based property, therefore traditional model checkers are not directly able ...
Anonymity is not a trace-based property, therefore traditional model checkers are not directly able ...
Security protocols specify the communication required to achieve security objectives, e.g., data-pri...
Anonymity is not a trace-based property, therefore traditional model checkers are not directly able ...
Anonymity is not a trace-based property, therefore traditional model checkers are not directly able ...
AbstractAnonymity is not a trace-based property, therefore traditional model checkers are not direct...
Security properties naturally combine temporal aspects of protocols with aspects of knowledge of the...
Abstract. Security properties naturally combine temporal aspects of protocols with aspects of knowle...
Security properties naturally combine temporal aspects of protocols with aspects of knowledge of the...
Security properties naturally combine temporal aspects of protocols with aspects of knowledge of the...
We propose a unifying framework for formal specification and verification of both epistemic and beha...
We propose a unifying framework for formal specification and verification of both epistemic and beha...
This dissertation presents a logical investigation of epistemic protocols, focussing on protocol-dyn...
Anonymity is not a trace-based property, therefore traditional model checkers are not directly able ...
Anonymity is not a trace-based property, therefore traditional model checkers are not directly able ...
Anonymity is not a trace-based property, therefore traditional model checkers are not directly able ...
Anonymity is not a trace-based property, therefore traditional model checkers are not directly able ...
Security protocols specify the communication required to achieve security objectives, e.g., data-pri...
Anonymity is not a trace-based property, therefore traditional model checkers are not directly able ...
Anonymity is not a trace-based property, therefore traditional model checkers are not directly able ...
AbstractAnonymity is not a trace-based property, therefore traditional model checkers are not direct...