Add to ORKGThe quality of argumentation in parliamentary debates may play an important role in the evaluation of legislative decisions. In this contribution I will discuss shortcomings in the application of the pragma-dialectical argumentation theory for the analysis and evaluation of the argumentation in a parliamentary debate op the penalization of stalking. The case illustrates that institutional preconditions of a specific type of debate should be taken into account in order to be able to give an adequate analysis of these debates
Examples or exemplary cases may perform an important role in parliamentary debates. Members of Parli...
I give a pragma-dialectical reconstruction of the role of teleological-evaluative argumentation refe...
To illustrate the development of argumentation theory, the paper traces the journey of the pragma-di...
ABSTRACT: The quality of argumentation in parliamentary debates may play an important role in the ev...
The quality of argumentation in parliamentary debates may play an important role in the evaluation o...
In order to be able to evaluate argumentation supporting judicial decisions, certain norms of reason...
Having accurate information about the arguments presented for and against a legislative proposal in ...
In this paper, close attention is paid to the argumentative patterns resulting from combining pragma...
This paper focuses on argumentation in a specific institutional context: debate in the European Parl...
This paper focuses on argumentation the institutional context of debate in the European Parliament. ...
The paper outlines some institutional characteristics of Second Reading debates on public bills in t...
This thesis critically reviews the pragma-dialectical approach to the study of argumentationadvanced...
In this article it is claimed that legal argumentation should part from principles contained in argu...
This contribution discusses some problems of Pragma-Dialectics and explains them by its consensualis...
The aim of this paper is to describe the way in which argumentative patterns come into being in plen...
Examples or exemplary cases may perform an important role in parliamentary debates. Members of Parli...
I give a pragma-dialectical reconstruction of the role of teleological-evaluative argumentation refe...
To illustrate the development of argumentation theory, the paper traces the journey of the pragma-di...
ABSTRACT: The quality of argumentation in parliamentary debates may play an important role in the ev...
The quality of argumentation in parliamentary debates may play an important role in the evaluation o...
In order to be able to evaluate argumentation supporting judicial decisions, certain norms of reason...
Having accurate information about the arguments presented for and against a legislative proposal in ...
In this paper, close attention is paid to the argumentative patterns resulting from combining pragma...
This paper focuses on argumentation in a specific institutional context: debate in the European Parl...
This paper focuses on argumentation the institutional context of debate in the European Parliament. ...
The paper outlines some institutional characteristics of Second Reading debates on public bills in t...
This thesis critically reviews the pragma-dialectical approach to the study of argumentationadvanced...
In this article it is claimed that legal argumentation should part from principles contained in argu...
This contribution discusses some problems of Pragma-Dialectics and explains them by its consensualis...
The aim of this paper is to describe the way in which argumentative patterns come into being in plen...
Examples or exemplary cases may perform an important role in parliamentary debates. Members of Parli...
I give a pragma-dialectical reconstruction of the role of teleological-evaluative argumentation refe...
To illustrate the development of argumentation theory, the paper traces the journey of the pragma-di...