Contact, typology and the speaker: the essentials of language [Review of: N.J. Enfield (2002) Linguistic epidemiology. Semantics and grammar of language contact in mainland Southeast Asia.]

This paper focuses on some of the theoretical assumptions presented in Enfield, 2003 (Review of `Enfield, N.J., 2003. Linguistic Epidemiology: Semantics and grammar of language contact in mainland Southeast Asia. Routledge Curzon, London and New York, pp. xv + 397') and their consequences for contemporary linguistic theory. In particular, I revisit three fundamental dimensions underlying language contact: multilingual practices of speech communities, modes of transmission and typological diversity. These three dimensions, I argue, are not only the reasons for contact to occur but the fundamental driving forces behind language change (and variation) at large. In this view, the dichotomy typically presented as `contact-induced' or `external' vs. `normal' or `internal' change needs to be significantly revised, if not dissolved, since a non-idealized view of language change as the one advocated by Enfield presents us with a reality in which the role of contact can hardly ever be overlooked