Add to ORKGIn medical consultation, it is the doctor’s task to advise patients about health related problems. This advice might not immediately be acceptable to the patient, for instance, because he has to drastically change his behaviour. In such cases, the doctor could attempt to make the advice acceptable by providing argumentation. To analyse and evaluate argumentation in medical consultation, I will argue in this paper that, from a pragma-dialectical perspective, medical consultation could be analysed as a communicative activity type
Shared medical decision-making has been analyzed as a particular kind of argumentative discussion. I...
This paper throws some light on the nature of argumentation, its use and advantages, within the sett...
The paper presents partial results from an ongoing research on communication in the medical setting....
In medical consultation, the doctor’s advice (or the support for it) is not always immediately accep...
Shared medical decision-making has been analyzed as a particular kind of argumentative discussion. I...
Argumentation can play an important role in medical consultation. A doctor could, for instance, argu...
Over the past decade, the ideal model of shared decision-making has been increasingly promoted as th...
General practice consultation has often been characterized by pragma-dialecticians as an argumentati...
Argumentation can play an important role in medical consultation. A doctor could, for instance, argu...
Advice seeking and advice giving have been studied both as speech acts and as complex discursive act...
In this paper we approach medical Shared Decision-Making (SDM) from the perspective of the pragma-di...
In view of a growing interest in argumentative discourse in the context of patient-centered consulta...
General practice consultation has often been characterized by pragma-dialecticians as an argumentati...
In recent years, the model of shared decision-making has become increasingly promoted as the preferr...
Jacobs, S. (2000). Rhetoric and dialectic from the standpoint of normative pragmatics
Shared medical decision-making has been analyzed as a particular kind of argumentative discussion. I...
This paper throws some light on the nature of argumentation, its use and advantages, within the sett...
The paper presents partial results from an ongoing research on communication in the medical setting....
In medical consultation, the doctor’s advice (or the support for it) is not always immediately accep...
Shared medical decision-making has been analyzed as a particular kind of argumentative discussion. I...
Argumentation can play an important role in medical consultation. A doctor could, for instance, argu...
Over the past decade, the ideal model of shared decision-making has been increasingly promoted as th...
General practice consultation has often been characterized by pragma-dialecticians as an argumentati...
Argumentation can play an important role in medical consultation. A doctor could, for instance, argu...
Advice seeking and advice giving have been studied both as speech acts and as complex discursive act...
In this paper we approach medical Shared Decision-Making (SDM) from the perspective of the pragma-di...
In view of a growing interest in argumentative discourse in the context of patient-centered consulta...
General practice consultation has often been characterized by pragma-dialecticians as an argumentati...
In recent years, the model of shared decision-making has become increasingly promoted as the preferr...
Jacobs, S. (2000). Rhetoric and dialectic from the standpoint of normative pragmatics
Shared medical decision-making has been analyzed as a particular kind of argumentative discussion. I...
This paper throws some light on the nature of argumentation, its use and advantages, within the sett...
The paper presents partial results from an ongoing research on communication in the medical setting....