This thematic report, prepared for the ILA Study Group on Principles on the Engagement of Domestic Courts with International Law (May 2011), supplements the trends and principles provided in the ILA Study Group’s Preliminary Report (2012). The report examines (I) how domestic courts engage with the findings of UN human rights treaty monitoring bodies; (II) on what basis; and (III) why some courts are more willing to engage with the findings while others are not. This report highlights the selective and partial accommodation of the international findings by domestic courts which thereby approve and contest the treaty bodies’ opinions and their legitimacy
This unique book examines the role and impact of human rights norms in international courts other th...
Item does not contain fulltextOne of the two mandates of the ILA Human Rights Law Committee (2009–20...
1. At the London Conference of the Association in 2000 the Executive Council approved the proposal o...
This article analyses both cooperative and confrontational interactions between domestic judges and ...
This article analyses both cooperative and confrontational interactions between domestic judges and ...
This article analyses both cooperative and confrontational interactions between domestic judges and ...
This article analyses both cooperative and confrontational interactions between domestic judges and ...
This chapter analyses normative pathways that guide the deliberative space involving UN human rights...
This chapter analyses normative pathways that guide the deliberative space involving UN human rights...
This chapter analyses normative pathways that guide the deliberative space involving UN human rights...
There are two significant trends in how domestic courts applying international law: (i) they are exp...
There are two significant trends in how domestic courts applying international law: (i) they are exp...
There are two significant trends in how domestic courts applying international law: (i) they are exp...
There are two significant trends in how domestic courts applying international law: (i) they are exp...
Item does not contain fulltextThis book attempts to establish how courts of general jurisdiction dif...
This unique book examines the role and impact of human rights norms in international courts other th...
Item does not contain fulltextOne of the two mandates of the ILA Human Rights Law Committee (2009–20...
1. At the London Conference of the Association in 2000 the Executive Council approved the proposal o...
This article analyses both cooperative and confrontational interactions between domestic judges and ...
This article analyses both cooperative and confrontational interactions between domestic judges and ...
This article analyses both cooperative and confrontational interactions between domestic judges and ...
This article analyses both cooperative and confrontational interactions between domestic judges and ...
This chapter analyses normative pathways that guide the deliberative space involving UN human rights...
This chapter analyses normative pathways that guide the deliberative space involving UN human rights...
This chapter analyses normative pathways that guide the deliberative space involving UN human rights...
There are two significant trends in how domestic courts applying international law: (i) they are exp...
There are two significant trends in how domestic courts applying international law: (i) they are exp...
There are two significant trends in how domestic courts applying international law: (i) they are exp...
There are two significant trends in how domestic courts applying international law: (i) they are exp...
Item does not contain fulltextThis book attempts to establish how courts of general jurisdiction dif...
This unique book examines the role and impact of human rights norms in international courts other th...
Item does not contain fulltextOne of the two mandates of the ILA Human Rights Law Committee (2009–20...
1. At the London Conference of the Association in 2000 the Executive Council approved the proposal o...