This commentary considers the pros and cons of the empirical approach to legislation from the vantage point of empirical decision making research. It focuses on methodological aspects that are typically not considered by legal scholars. It points out weaknesses in the empirical approach that are undesirable from the legislator's perspective, and proposes potential remedies to these problems. It thereby aims to reduce the vagueness in the perceived problems on the side of the opponents, to reduce excessive enthusiasm on the side of the proponents, and to provide a road map to more robust empirical legislation
Undertaking empirical research in law can be a daunting task, one for which current undergraduate an...
The increasing success of the evidence-based policy movement is raising the demand of empirically in...
Legal training focuses on the study of the nature of legal rules using ‘legal reasoning’. This empha...
This article looks at the incorporation of empirical research into legislation from a juridical law ...
To their credit, empirical legal scholars try to live up to the highest methodological standards fro...
Studies have shown that the effects of scientific research on law and policy making are often fairly...
One can divide empirical analysis of legal issues into three major branches: (1) the use of scientif...
Empirical Legal Studies promises a constructive coming together of empirical and doctrinal legal res...
We can observe and measure how legal decision makers use formal legal authorities, but there is no w...
Despite the abundance of studies exposing heuristic and biased thinking in judicial decision-making,...
Although the term empirical research has become commonplace in legal scholarship over the past two...
Most theoretical models predict that institutions allowing for direct legislation should lead, on av...
The traditional theories of judicial decision-making have their differences set around the importanc...
Throughout its history, the development of theoretical law and economics has depended on, and been s...
Legal scholarship is becoming increasingly empirical. Although empirical methodologies gain importan...
Undertaking empirical research in law can be a daunting task, one for which current undergraduate an...
The increasing success of the evidence-based policy movement is raising the demand of empirically in...
Legal training focuses on the study of the nature of legal rules using ‘legal reasoning’. This empha...
This article looks at the incorporation of empirical research into legislation from a juridical law ...
To their credit, empirical legal scholars try to live up to the highest methodological standards fro...
Studies have shown that the effects of scientific research on law and policy making are often fairly...
One can divide empirical analysis of legal issues into three major branches: (1) the use of scientif...
Empirical Legal Studies promises a constructive coming together of empirical and doctrinal legal res...
We can observe and measure how legal decision makers use formal legal authorities, but there is no w...
Despite the abundance of studies exposing heuristic and biased thinking in judicial decision-making,...
Although the term empirical research has become commonplace in legal scholarship over the past two...
Most theoretical models predict that institutions allowing for direct legislation should lead, on av...
The traditional theories of judicial decision-making have their differences set around the importanc...
Throughout its history, the development of theoretical law and economics has depended on, and been s...
Legal scholarship is becoming increasingly empirical. Although empirical methodologies gain importan...
Undertaking empirical research in law can be a daunting task, one for which current undergraduate an...
The increasing success of the evidence-based policy movement is raising the demand of empirically in...
Legal training focuses on the study of the nature of legal rules using ‘legal reasoning’. This empha...