Add to ORKGThis paper discusses the scope of the EU principle of legal professional privilege ('LPP') and the mechanisms for bottom-up integration. LPP refers to the confidential nature of certain written communications between lawyer and client. Bottom-up integration is the process whereby domestic legal principles are elevated to EU legal principles. The recent Akzo Nobel judgment of the European Court of Justice revisits the principle of LPP and clarifies the conditions for bottom-up integration
The regulation of professional services has been high on the political agenda for years now in Europ...
The chief aim of this study is to explore the essence of legal professional privilege and analyse it...
Although the establishment of competition rules forms part of the EU’s exclusive competences, the ap...
This paper discusses the scope of the EU principle of legal professional privilege ('LPP') and the m...
In common law jurisdictions, the right to protect confidentiality of communications between a profes...
The main reasons why the importance of Legal Professional Privilege (‘LPP’) has been emphasised in p...
Although set against the background of investigations by the European Commission in proceedings for ...
Is there, in the context of the recent developments related to the Lisbon Treaty, a need for substan...
The AM & S Europe judgment by the Court of Justice of the European Union was the first ruling on the...
International audienceThis paper presents the paradoxical co-existence of secrecy and transparency i...
The free movement of judgments in the European Area of Justice presupposes a high level of mutual tr...
I will focus my contribution on two distinct limitations on the Commision\u27s investigative rights ...
Analyses the European Court of Justice ruling in Ordre des Barreaux Francophones et Germanophone v C...
The article compares the application of the right of defence in competition law proceedings by seven...
Legal Professional Privilege is a material procedural safeguard that ensures protection of communica...
The regulation of professional services has been high on the political agenda for years now in Europ...
The chief aim of this study is to explore the essence of legal professional privilege and analyse it...
Although the establishment of competition rules forms part of the EU’s exclusive competences, the ap...
This paper discusses the scope of the EU principle of legal professional privilege ('LPP') and the m...
In common law jurisdictions, the right to protect confidentiality of communications between a profes...
The main reasons why the importance of Legal Professional Privilege (‘LPP’) has been emphasised in p...
Although set against the background of investigations by the European Commission in proceedings for ...
Is there, in the context of the recent developments related to the Lisbon Treaty, a need for substan...
The AM & S Europe judgment by the Court of Justice of the European Union was the first ruling on the...
International audienceThis paper presents the paradoxical co-existence of secrecy and transparency i...
The free movement of judgments in the European Area of Justice presupposes a high level of mutual tr...
I will focus my contribution on two distinct limitations on the Commision\u27s investigative rights ...
Analyses the European Court of Justice ruling in Ordre des Barreaux Francophones et Germanophone v C...
The article compares the application of the right of defence in competition law proceedings by seven...
Legal Professional Privilege is a material procedural safeguard that ensures protection of communica...
The regulation of professional services has been high on the political agenda for years now in Europ...
The chief aim of this study is to explore the essence of legal professional privilege and analyse it...
Although the establishment of competition rules forms part of the EU’s exclusive competences, the ap...