Addressing anticipated countermoves is a commonplace practice in argumentative discourse. A speaker in a discussion may anticipate the objections of an opponent and deal with them in advance. Likewise, a writer can make it clear to his readers that he does not expect them to take his views uncritically and addresses the criticism that he anticipates from them. With the help of the pragma-dialectical concept of strategic manoeuvring, I will investigate the various ways in which addressing anticipated countermoves can function as an argumentative technique aimed to provide the strongest possible defence for the arguer's position
The room for strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse depends not only on the dialectical an...
This paper examines arguments that take counterconsiderations into account, and it does so from a di...
One of the traditional ways in which we manage dissensus is by argumentation, which may be construed...
Choosing variants of pragmatic argumentation in anticipation of countermoves in health brochure
This paper investigates the role that the stylistic device of praeteritio (or paralipsis) can play i...
A key and continuing concern within the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation is how to account...
Against the background of the standard pragma-dialectical theory, some fifteen years ago Van Eemeren...
In this paper, I will determine the strategic function of the use of four variants of pragmatic argu...
In this chapter van Eemeren, Garssen and Meuffels explore the possibilities of effectiveness researc...
In a critical discussion, interlocutors can strategically maneuver by shading their expressed degree...
The main aim of an argumentative speech act complex, as defined in argumentation theory, is to resol...
In a critical discussion, interlocutors can strategically maneuver by shading their expressed degree...
Abstract: This paper examines arguments that take counter-considerations into account, and it does s...
This paper examines arguments that take counter- considerations into account, and it does so from a ...
Insight into the strategic design of argumentative discourse can be gained by incorporating insight ...
The room for strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse depends not only on the dialectical an...
This paper examines arguments that take counterconsiderations into account, and it does so from a di...
One of the traditional ways in which we manage dissensus is by argumentation, which may be construed...
Choosing variants of pragmatic argumentation in anticipation of countermoves in health brochure
This paper investigates the role that the stylistic device of praeteritio (or paralipsis) can play i...
A key and continuing concern within the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation is how to account...
Against the background of the standard pragma-dialectical theory, some fifteen years ago Van Eemeren...
In this paper, I will determine the strategic function of the use of four variants of pragmatic argu...
In this chapter van Eemeren, Garssen and Meuffels explore the possibilities of effectiveness researc...
In a critical discussion, interlocutors can strategically maneuver by shading their expressed degree...
The main aim of an argumentative speech act complex, as defined in argumentation theory, is to resol...
In a critical discussion, interlocutors can strategically maneuver by shading their expressed degree...
Abstract: This paper examines arguments that take counter-considerations into account, and it does s...
This paper examines arguments that take counter- considerations into account, and it does so from a ...
Insight into the strategic design of argumentative discourse can be gained by incorporating insight ...
The room for strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse depends not only on the dialectical an...
This paper examines arguments that take counterconsiderations into account, and it does so from a di...
One of the traditional ways in which we manage dissensus is by argumentation, which may be construed...