The put call parity is based on a static portfolio argument that requires no distributional assumptions. Risk-neutral valuation gives a further way to specify the relationship between put and call prices. The two expressions coincide when the discounted asset price is a martingale. However, the martingale property must not hold in empirically relevant CEV and stochastic volatility models and this causes the two parities to differ. We argue that the familiar put call parity then is to be discarded. This finding implies that the familiar put call parity should only be used when it is ascertained beforehand that the underlying is a martingale
This paper derives put-call parity relations for barrier options via a probabilistic approach. As in...
We extend to the Heston stochastic volatility framework the parity result of McDonald and Schroder (...
Numerous papers have investigated the forecasting power of Black-Scholes volatility versus a time se...
We give an example where the put-call parity does not hold and we give the domain of validity of thi...
The discounted stock price under the Constant Elasticity of Variance model is not a martingale when ...
We extend the Fundamental Theorem of Finance and the Pricing Rule Representation Theorem to the case...
The put-call parity is free from distributional assumptions. It is tempting to assume that this pari...
The original put-call parity relations hold under the premise that the underlying security does not ...
This note discusses and corrects an inaccurate statement in Veestraeten (2008) concerning the valuat...
Option pricing theory encompasses two distinct contracts, the call option and the put option. Existi...
Lieu (1990) derived the put-call parity relationship for futures and futures option contracts where ...
In this paper, the boundary conditions for put-call parity are extended to take into account the pot...
Four distribution functions are associated with call and put prices seen as functions of their strik...
In this article, we examined the validity of 'Put Call Parity' (PCP) in the Israeli stock market. Es...
The conflict between appearance and reality often arises in the law, where it is usually cast as pit...
This paper derives put-call parity relations for barrier options via a probabilistic approach. As in...
We extend to the Heston stochastic volatility framework the parity result of McDonald and Schroder (...
Numerous papers have investigated the forecasting power of Black-Scholes volatility versus a time se...
We give an example where the put-call parity does not hold and we give the domain of validity of thi...
The discounted stock price under the Constant Elasticity of Variance model is not a martingale when ...
We extend the Fundamental Theorem of Finance and the Pricing Rule Representation Theorem to the case...
The put-call parity is free from distributional assumptions. It is tempting to assume that this pari...
The original put-call parity relations hold under the premise that the underlying security does not ...
This note discusses and corrects an inaccurate statement in Veestraeten (2008) concerning the valuat...
Option pricing theory encompasses two distinct contracts, the call option and the put option. Existi...
Lieu (1990) derived the put-call parity relationship for futures and futures option contracts where ...
In this paper, the boundary conditions for put-call parity are extended to take into account the pot...
Four distribution functions are associated with call and put prices seen as functions of their strik...
In this article, we examined the validity of 'Put Call Parity' (PCP) in the Israeli stock market. Es...
The conflict between appearance and reality often arises in the law, where it is usually cast as pit...
This paper derives put-call parity relations for barrier options via a probabilistic approach. As in...
We extend to the Heston stochastic volatility framework the parity result of McDonald and Schroder (...
Numerous papers have investigated the forecasting power of Black-Scholes volatility versus a time se...