Add to ORKGOn 22 September, the Amsterdam Center for International Law held a discussion on some of the controversies triggered by the International Court of Justice’s Kosovo advisory opinion. This commentary is part of a series discussing the opinion and its possible implications for Kosovo’s legal status as well as the added value of the opinion for the development of international law and the settlement of international disputes
The present contribution critically analyses the ICJ advisory opinion on Kosovo, especially focussin...
International law is arguably no longer dominated by a state-centric approach. Non-state actors, suc...
After Kosovo’s independence, politicians and the press of various territorial entities aspiring for ...
On 22 September, the Amsterdam Center for International Law held a discussion on some of the controv...
In its Advisory Opinion of 22 July 2010, the International Court of Justice concluded that the decla...
On July 22, 2010 the International Court of Justice issued an Advisory opinion to determine the issu...
Abstract In the Kosovo Advisory Opinion, the International Court of Justice took the position that K...
The status of Kosovo remains controversial among international lawyers. Yet while international law ...
For 60 years, the international community has limited the right of territories to gain independence ...
The ICJ Advisory Opinion (22 July 2010) through which the consistency of unilateral declaration of i...
This short note discusses, from the standpoint of general international law, the declaration of inde...
International audienceThe objective of this paper is to examine how the Court has dealt with existin...
Kosovo's declaration of independence on 28th February 2008 has had a profound and polarising impact ...
The Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice on the declaration of independence of Kos...
The relevance of the Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice of 22 July 2010 rests in...
The present contribution critically analyses the ICJ advisory opinion on Kosovo, especially focussin...
International law is arguably no longer dominated by a state-centric approach. Non-state actors, suc...
After Kosovo’s independence, politicians and the press of various territorial entities aspiring for ...
On 22 September, the Amsterdam Center for International Law held a discussion on some of the controv...
In its Advisory Opinion of 22 July 2010, the International Court of Justice concluded that the decla...
On July 22, 2010 the International Court of Justice issued an Advisory opinion to determine the issu...
Abstract In the Kosovo Advisory Opinion, the International Court of Justice took the position that K...
The status of Kosovo remains controversial among international lawyers. Yet while international law ...
For 60 years, the international community has limited the right of territories to gain independence ...
The ICJ Advisory Opinion (22 July 2010) through which the consistency of unilateral declaration of i...
This short note discusses, from the standpoint of general international law, the declaration of inde...
International audienceThe objective of this paper is to examine how the Court has dealt with existin...
Kosovo's declaration of independence on 28th February 2008 has had a profound and polarising impact ...
The Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice on the declaration of independence of Kos...
The relevance of the Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice of 22 July 2010 rests in...
The present contribution critically analyses the ICJ advisory opinion on Kosovo, especially focussin...
International law is arguably no longer dominated by a state-centric approach. Non-state actors, suc...
After Kosovo’s independence, politicians and the press of various territorial entities aspiring for ...