This paper points out that the notion of meaning propounded by inquisitive semantics is not only suited to capture both informative and inquisitive content, but also a sentence's potential to draw attention to certain possibilities. This gives rise to a novel analysis of might
AbstractThis paper examines the functions of seem in the Corpus of English Philosophy Texts (CEPhiT)...
AbstrAct This paper describes the use of perhaps, maybe and possibly in a cross-disciplinary corpus ...
Why do we use epistemic modals like 'might'? According to Factualism, the function of 'might' is to ...
This paper points out that the notion of meaning propounded by inquisitive semantics is not only sui...
This paper points out that the notion of meaning propounded by inquisitive semantics is not only sui...
This paper presents a notion of meaning that captures both informative and inquisitive content, whic...
We present and motivate an interpretation of epistemic Might, which is as indexical as its dynamic p...
In this paper we present an alternative interpretation of statements of epistemic possibility, which...
Traditionally, meaning is identified with informative content. The central aim of inquisitive semant...
We present an inferentialist account of the epistemic modal operator might. Our starting point is th...
We need a better explanation of the differences in meaning and use between can and may. This paper p...
There is an age-old tradition in linguistics and philosophy to identify the meaning of a entence wit...
We introduce an inquisitive semantics for a language of propositional logic, where the interpretatio...
Although it is still often stigmatised as a grammatical deviation,may have has been increasingly use...
The study is concerned with the English modal auxiliaries CAN and MAY and their morphologically past...
AbstractThis paper examines the functions of seem in the Corpus of English Philosophy Texts (CEPhiT)...
AbstrAct This paper describes the use of perhaps, maybe and possibly in a cross-disciplinary corpus ...
Why do we use epistemic modals like 'might'? According to Factualism, the function of 'might' is to ...
This paper points out that the notion of meaning propounded by inquisitive semantics is not only sui...
This paper points out that the notion of meaning propounded by inquisitive semantics is not only sui...
This paper presents a notion of meaning that captures both informative and inquisitive content, whic...
We present and motivate an interpretation of epistemic Might, which is as indexical as its dynamic p...
In this paper we present an alternative interpretation of statements of epistemic possibility, which...
Traditionally, meaning is identified with informative content. The central aim of inquisitive semant...
We present an inferentialist account of the epistemic modal operator might. Our starting point is th...
We need a better explanation of the differences in meaning and use between can and may. This paper p...
There is an age-old tradition in linguistics and philosophy to identify the meaning of a entence wit...
We introduce an inquisitive semantics for a language of propositional logic, where the interpretatio...
Although it is still often stigmatised as a grammatical deviation,may have has been increasingly use...
The study is concerned with the English modal auxiliaries CAN and MAY and their morphologically past...
AbstractThis paper examines the functions of seem in the Corpus of English Philosophy Texts (CEPhiT)...
AbstrAct This paper describes the use of perhaps, maybe and possibly in a cross-disciplinary corpus ...
Why do we use epistemic modals like 'might'? According to Factualism, the function of 'might' is to ...
DOI
Add to ORKG