Appropriateness of Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Comparison of American and Swiss Criteria

Objective: Examine the reproducibility of the RAND method for developing criteria for the appropriateness of medical procedures. Design: Comparison of two sets of explicit criteria for appropriateness of upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy, developed by separate expert panels from two countries.Setting: United States, Switzerland. Study participants: National experts from different medical specialties involved in the referral or application of UGI endoscopy.Interventions: Each panel was presented with about 500clinical scenarios (indications)that were rated on a nine-point scale as to the appropriateness of performing UGI endoscopy for a patient with that clinical presentation. Main outcome measurer: (1) distribution of appropriateness ratings and intrapanel agreement categories between the two panels, (2)between-panel agreement of assigning appropriateness for comparable indications and, (3) percentage of indications with major between-panel differences. Results: Ratings for 2/3 of indications could be compared. The Swiss panel showed higher intrapanel agreement (54.6% versus 46.2% p=0.002). Seventy-eight percent of comparable Indications were assigned to indentical categories of appropriateness by both panels (kappa=0.76,P