ABSTRACT: Meno's Thesis—the idea that knowing something is better than merely having a true belief about it—is incompatible with the joint claims that (a) believing the truth is the sole source of the value of knowledge and (b) true belief and knowledge are equally successful in believing the truth. Recent answers to that so-called "swamping” problem reject either (a) or (b). This paper rejects Meno's Thesis instead, as relying on a confusion between expected value and value proper. The proposed solution relies on an externalist view of rationality, which is presente
What should knowledge first theorists say about the value of knowledge? In this paper I approach thi...
Why is knowledge better than mere true belief ? To make progress in answering that question, we need...
The value problem for knowledge is the problem of explaining why knowledge is more valuable than mer...
Meno’s Thesis—the idea that knowing something is better than merely having a true belief about it—is...
This paper concerns questions of value in regards to truth and knowledge. Beginning with a cursory o...
The current literature on the value of knowledge is marred by two unwarranted presumptions, which to...
ABSTRACT: We argue that the so-called ‘Primary’ and ‘Secondary’ Value Problems for knowledge are mor...
The current literature on the value of knowledge is marred by two unwarranted presumptions, which to...
This paper concerns questions of value in regards to truth and knowledge. Beginning with a cursory o...
We argue that the so-called ‘Primary’ and ‘Secondary’ Value Problems for knowledge are more easily s...
ABSTRACT: We argue that the so-called ‘Primary ’ and ‘Secondary ’ Value Problems for knowledge are m...
The value problem of knowledge is one of the prominent prolems that philosophical accounts of knowle...
The value of knowledge has always been a central topic within epistemology. Going all the way back t...
That truth provides the standard for believing appears to be a platitude, one which dovetails with t...
I introduce and defend an argument against the popular view that anything falling short of knowledge...
What should knowledge first theorists say about the value of knowledge? In this paper I approach thi...
Why is knowledge better than mere true belief ? To make progress in answering that question, we need...
The value problem for knowledge is the problem of explaining why knowledge is more valuable than mer...
Meno’s Thesis—the idea that knowing something is better than merely having a true belief about it—is...
This paper concerns questions of value in regards to truth and knowledge. Beginning with a cursory o...
The current literature on the value of knowledge is marred by two unwarranted presumptions, which to...
ABSTRACT: We argue that the so-called ‘Primary’ and ‘Secondary’ Value Problems for knowledge are mor...
The current literature on the value of knowledge is marred by two unwarranted presumptions, which to...
This paper concerns questions of value in regards to truth and knowledge. Beginning with a cursory o...
We argue that the so-called ‘Primary’ and ‘Secondary’ Value Problems for knowledge are more easily s...
ABSTRACT: We argue that the so-called ‘Primary ’ and ‘Secondary ’ Value Problems for knowledge are m...
The value problem of knowledge is one of the prominent prolems that philosophical accounts of knowle...
The value of knowledge has always been a central topic within epistemology. Going all the way back t...
That truth provides the standard for believing appears to be a platitude, one which dovetails with t...
I introduce and defend an argument against the popular view that anything falling short of knowledge...
What should knowledge first theorists say about the value of knowledge? In this paper I approach thi...
Why is knowledge better than mere true belief ? To make progress in answering that question, we need...
The value problem for knowledge is the problem of explaining why knowledge is more valuable than mer...