The evaluation of management in the forests of urbarial communities in the area of Murska Sobota

V sodelovanju s člani urbarialnih skupnosti Pince, Dolina in Čentiba ter gozdnogospodarskih načrtov za gozdnogospodarske enote smo predstavili stanje gozdov urbarialnih skupnosti ter podrobnosti njihovega delovanja. Osredotočili smo se na primerjavo postopkov delitve drv, na podlagi katere smo primerjali učinkovitost delovanja v posameznih urbarialnih skupnostih. Razlike med postopki delitve drv smo prikazali s pomočjo rezultatov primerjav cenitve stoječega lesa na podlagi treh obravnavanih metod določitve volumna stoječega drevesa. Metoda 1 vključuje določitev volumna drevesa na podlagi enovhodnih prirejenih Schaefferjevih volumenskih tarif, Metoda 2 temelji na okularni oceni ter izkušnjah skupine ocenjevalcev, Metoda 3 določa volumne na podlagi v preteklosti podanih ocen, ki so pripisane določenim prsnim premerom. Ugotovili smo, da je najbolj učinkovit način gospodarjenja z Metodo 1 v urbarialni skupnosti Pince s srednjim odstopanjem med pripadajočo in dobljeno količino lesa 0.59 m3 na deležnika, sledita Metoda 3 v urbarialni skupnosti Čentiba z odstopanjem 0.63 m3 na deležnika ter Metoda 2 v urbarialni skupnosti Dolina z odstopanjem 0.64 m3 na deležnika. Prednost skupnega gospodarjenja smo podkrepili s primerjavo realizacije poseka v gozdu zasebnega lastništva iz območja Kobilja in gozda urbarialne skupnosti Čentiba za preteklo načrtovalno obdobje. V raziskavi smo predstavili tudi socialni pomen urbarialnih skupnosti za vasi na obravnavanih območjih.In cooperation with the urbarial communities of Pince, Dolina, Čentiba and the forest management plans we presented the conditions and the details of their functioning. We have demonstrated the differences between the procedures of firewood distribution by using the results of comparisons of valuation of standing wood based on three methods. Method 1 determines the volume of trees on the basis of adapted Schaeffer volume tariffs, method 2 is based on ocular assessment and experience, method 3 determines volume based on past ratings assigned to diameters. The most effective method of forest management is the method 1 used in the urbarial community Pince with a mean deviation between the corresponding and the resulting amount of wood per participle 0.59 m3, followed by method 3 used in the urbarial community Čentiba with tolerance of 0.63 m3 per participle and method 2 used in the urbarial community Dolina with tolerance of 0.64 m3 per participle. We have strengthened the advantage of joint management by comparing the realissation of annual allowed cut between a forest of private ownership in Kobilje and the forest of the urbarial community Čentiba. We have also introduced social importance of the urbarial communities in the mentioned areas