The meaning of good faith in acquiring ownership of immovables through prescription with comparison to the legislations of Austria, Germany and Switzerland

V stvarnem pravu, ki prvenstveno ureja razmerja med subjekti glede objektov, sem zasledil nedorečenost, ki jo želim raziskati podrobneje. Pridobitvi lastninske pravice na podlagi zakona, ki jo omogoča Stvarnopravni zakonik (SPZ) pravimo priposestvovanje. Za to, da na tak način nekdo pridobi lastninsko pravico, pa morajo biti izpolnjeni še nekateri nadaljnji pogoji, ki so potek priposestvovalne dobe, lastniška posest, ki jo sestavlja zavest priposestvovalca, da objekt poseduje kot lastnik ter dobra vera, ki pomeni da posestnik ne ve in ne more vedeti, da ni lastnik. Pri presoji ali je izpolnjen pogoj dobre vere za izvirni način pridobitve ene od naštetih pravic, se namreč pojavlja veliko različnih interpretacij tako s strani sodne prakse kot s strani pravne teorije. Sodna praksa se odloča za povsem drug pristop za presojo ali je pogoj dobre vere izpolnjen. Ne zahteva namreč, da je za pogoj dobre vere priposestvovalec tudi vpisan v zemljiško knjigo. Pravna teorija po drugi strani zastopa stališče, po katerem priposestvovalec ne more biti v dobri veri, če je iz javne zemljiške knjige razvidno, da ni vpisan kot lastnik. Ker mora poznati zakone na območju pravnega reda na katerem deluje mora tudi vedeti, da je pri pravnoposlovnih pridobitvah stvarnih pravic, ki se vpisujejo v zemljiško knjigo, konstitutivnega pomena za nastanek, prenos, obremenitev pravice ravno vpis v zemljiško knjigo. Ker mu to pravilo pa načelu ignorantia iuris nocet mora biti znano in ker je zemljiška knjiga javna knjiga, na vpogled vsakomur, se priposestvovalec mora zavedati da zaradi odsotnosti vpisa v zemljiško knjigo ne more biti lastnik. Zaradi tega tudi ne more biti dobroverni lastniški posestnik, iz česar izhaja tudi temeljna hipoteza moje naloge, ki jo bom skozi temeljito obravnavo bodisi potrdil ali zavrnil, obenem pa ponudil vpogled v rešitve teh vprašanj tudi v pravnih sistemih Nemčije, Avstrije in Švice.Property law regulates relationships between different subjects, regarding objects. The main theme of my masters seminar is an institute in the area of civil law, with a funciton of uniting the legal portrait and the actual state of rights concerning real estate. It is a special way of aquiring ownership of immovable things, called prescription. In order for a person to aquire ownership by prescription, one has to be a possesor of the property, being in good faith he already is an owner. The good faith in Slovenian law means, that the possesor doesn\u27t know and cannot know, he is not the actual owner of the immovable thing in his possesion. Slovenan courts and legal theorethics have very different approaches and criteria on deciding whether this condition is met in different cases. The courts have decided in many cases in so far, that the condition of good faith was fulfilled, even though the possesor wasn\u27t enlisted as the owner in the land register. The part of the theory on the other hand, represents another standpoint, being, that the possesor cannot be in good faith, if the before mentioned condition isn\u27t met (the enlistment as the owner in the land register). Because it is everyones right and duty to know the legislation which applies on the area of the state (ignorantia iuris nocet), it is automatically his obligation to know the conditions, required to obtain ownership of an immovable thing (plot of land, real estate, appartment, etc.) weren\u27t fulfilled. Our legislation states, that the buyer of an immovable thing becomes an owner, when he registers as the owner in the land registry. Therefore it is everyones obligation to be aware of that fact. How can then somebody be in good faith, that he is the owner, when one knows, that the fundamental condition to aquire ownership wasn\u27t met? The main hypothesis of my work is, that therefore the conditions for prescriptions are hardly evere fulfilled, which is why the possibility of aqusition of ownership in this way is very limited. Through my work I will try to confirm or deny this thesis and ultimately compare our system with the solutions of legal frameworks of Germany, Austria and Switzerland