Traditionally, the president is seen as getting his way when it comes to foreign-policy issues; however, with treaty making, an aspect very much related to foreign policy, things are different. Treaties are seen as salient, high-profile, and requiring direct positive action by the Senate. Presidents with high approval ratings would expect to have a relatively easy job at getting treaties approved by the Senate, but when a president is faced with low public approval, one of the most useful tools at his disposal to get Senate approval is not in play. The authors look at a case study of President Carter and the ratification of the Panama Canal Treaties to suggest what “weak” presidents can do to get their way
How did the United States president\u27s perception of the US\u27s reputation influence that adminis...
Because of the widespread ramifications of foreign relations, discussion must perforce be confined t...
Article published in the Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review
The ability of American presidents to increase American involvement in Southeast Asia without a cong...
Conventional wisdom holds that the President of the United States has a high degree of autonomy over...
Treaties represent an important policy mechanism in U.S. foreign policy. There are good reasons to e...
In recent years many political leaders and publicists have sought to prove that the treaty-making pr...
Political leaders are ultimately responsible for their country?s foreign policy, but our understandi...
Evaluating the foreign policies of presidents while they are in office or shortly after their tenure...
The Framers did not intend the Constitution to be an all-inclusive bill of lading, for we cannot f...
U.S. presidents can choose the form of international agreements that they negotiate. Using the const...
As “the sole organ of the federal government in the field of international relations,” Presidents ha...
Studies of presidential-congressional relations often emphasize conflict between the two branches, a...
Collected biweekly contributions to the Pennsylvania Capital-Star, a nonpartisan, nonprofit news si...
Why does the United States sign environmental treaties but not ratify them? U.S. presidents have ne...
How did the United States president\u27s perception of the US\u27s reputation influence that adminis...
Because of the widespread ramifications of foreign relations, discussion must perforce be confined t...
Article published in the Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review
The ability of American presidents to increase American involvement in Southeast Asia without a cong...
Conventional wisdom holds that the President of the United States has a high degree of autonomy over...
Treaties represent an important policy mechanism in U.S. foreign policy. There are good reasons to e...
In recent years many political leaders and publicists have sought to prove that the treaty-making pr...
Political leaders are ultimately responsible for their country?s foreign policy, but our understandi...
Evaluating the foreign policies of presidents while they are in office or shortly after their tenure...
The Framers did not intend the Constitution to be an all-inclusive bill of lading, for we cannot f...
U.S. presidents can choose the form of international agreements that they negotiate. Using the const...
As “the sole organ of the federal government in the field of international relations,” Presidents ha...
Studies of presidential-congressional relations often emphasize conflict between the two branches, a...
Collected biweekly contributions to the Pennsylvania Capital-Star, a nonpartisan, nonprofit news si...
Why does the United States sign environmental treaties but not ratify them? U.S. presidents have ne...
How did the United States president\u27s perception of the US\u27s reputation influence that adminis...
Because of the widespread ramifications of foreign relations, discussion must perforce be confined t...
Article published in the Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review