In Federalist No. 78, Alexander Hamilton tells us that judges have “merely” judgment but does not explain what judgment means. This book provides that explanation. It compares judgment across a range of activities—consumer choices, religion, sports officiating, art and food criticism, and law—with the goal of better understanding legal judgment. After exploring these various modes of comparison, the book concludes that law judging is fundamentally discretionary and uncertain. It then falls to the legal profession to explain to the public, without undermining respect for law, why this is so. In this way, not unlike our perception of the uncertainties that confront sports officials or that pervade scientific research, the public will come to ...
Judicial review has come to be the most important power of the American judiciary. Recent decisions ...
In What\u27s Law Got to Do With It?, the nation\u27s top legal scholars and political scientists exa...
In this review of JasonWhitehead’s new book Judging judges, I explore the four broad types of judici...
In Federalist No. 78, Alexander Hamilton tells us that judges have “merely” judgment but does not ex...
Judgment is simple, right? This book begs to differ. Written for all students of the law—from underg...
Any effort to understand how law works has to take seriously its main players – judges. Like any per...
Is there any other activity as problematic as judgment? How is it possible that those who judge are ...
Scholarly and professional perceptions of the role of the judiciary, and hence of the responsibility...
How should judges decide the cases presented to them? In our system the answer is, “according to law...
How should judges decide the cases presented to them? In our system the answer is, “according to law...
The purpose of this conference is a dialogue between scholars and judges about judging. Because judg...
What does a judge do when he decides a case? It would be interesting to collect the answers ranging ...
Are judges supposed to be objective? Citizens, scholars, and legal professionals commonly assume tha...
Law and Judicial Duty traces the early history of what is today called “judicial review.” Working fr...
A core insight of the legal realists was that many disputes are indeterminate. For example, in many ...
Judicial review has come to be the most important power of the American judiciary. Recent decisions ...
In What\u27s Law Got to Do With It?, the nation\u27s top legal scholars and political scientists exa...
In this review of JasonWhitehead’s new book Judging judges, I explore the four broad types of judici...
In Federalist No. 78, Alexander Hamilton tells us that judges have “merely” judgment but does not ex...
Judgment is simple, right? This book begs to differ. Written for all students of the law—from underg...
Any effort to understand how law works has to take seriously its main players – judges. Like any per...
Is there any other activity as problematic as judgment? How is it possible that those who judge are ...
Scholarly and professional perceptions of the role of the judiciary, and hence of the responsibility...
How should judges decide the cases presented to them? In our system the answer is, “according to law...
How should judges decide the cases presented to them? In our system the answer is, “according to law...
The purpose of this conference is a dialogue between scholars and judges about judging. Because judg...
What does a judge do when he decides a case? It would be interesting to collect the answers ranging ...
Are judges supposed to be objective? Citizens, scholars, and legal professionals commonly assume tha...
Law and Judicial Duty traces the early history of what is today called “judicial review.” Working fr...
A core insight of the legal realists was that many disputes are indeterminate. For example, in many ...
Judicial review has come to be the most important power of the American judiciary. Recent decisions ...
In What\u27s Law Got to Do With It?, the nation\u27s top legal scholars and political scientists exa...
In this review of JasonWhitehead’s new book Judging judges, I explore the four broad types of judici...