In Novare Group, Inc. v. Sarif, the Georgia Supreme Court rejected the plaintiffs\u27 claim that the defendant brokers and developers violated the Georgia Fair Business Practices Act ( FBPA ), Georgia\u27s primary consumer protection statute. The author contends that the court\u27s approach in Novare undermines the Georgia General Assembly\u27s purpose in enacting the FBPA to protect consumers from unfair or deceptive practices. The article criticizes the court for treating claims under the FBPA the same as common law fraud claims. It also examines the court\u27s treatment of reliance, parol evidence, merger clauses and legislative silence. Finally, the article discusses the implications for future actions seeking redress for FBPA violation...
(Excerpt) This Note determines that whether a named plaintiff has standing to assert claims relating...
The North Carolina General Assembly enacted the Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices Act in 1969. Th...
The Georgia Supreme Court reviewed, and reversed, two cases featured prominently in last year\u27s I...
In Novare Group, Inc. v. Sarif, the Georgia Supreme Court rejected the plaintiffs\u27 claim that the...
A sub-clause of Georgia\u27s business venue statute, as construed in October 2016, violates the Comm...
Georgia law prohibits any foreign corporation—a corporation with an originating registration initiat...
Generally, courts may only set aside arbitration awards on the grounds listed in the Federal Arbitra...
During its 1968 session the Georgia Legislature passed a bill intending to create a right of action ...
A deal between a shipper from California, unlicensed in Georgia to deal in agricultural products, an...
The Act requires certain disclosures to structured settlement sellers, including discount rates, fee...
Since the late sixties the field of creditors\u27 remedies has undergone a series of changes brought...
In recent years, there has been an increase in consumer protection class action litigation in federa...
Since Congress first enacted the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) in 1925, arbitration agreements have ...
Without even knowing it, just about everyone has agreed to settle disputes through arbitration and h...
The most noteworthy and important developments in trial practice and procedure during this survey pe...
(Excerpt) This Note determines that whether a named plaintiff has standing to assert claims relating...
The North Carolina General Assembly enacted the Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices Act in 1969. Th...
The Georgia Supreme Court reviewed, and reversed, two cases featured prominently in last year\u27s I...
In Novare Group, Inc. v. Sarif, the Georgia Supreme Court rejected the plaintiffs\u27 claim that the...
A sub-clause of Georgia\u27s business venue statute, as construed in October 2016, violates the Comm...
Georgia law prohibits any foreign corporation—a corporation with an originating registration initiat...
Generally, courts may only set aside arbitration awards on the grounds listed in the Federal Arbitra...
During its 1968 session the Georgia Legislature passed a bill intending to create a right of action ...
A deal between a shipper from California, unlicensed in Georgia to deal in agricultural products, an...
The Act requires certain disclosures to structured settlement sellers, including discount rates, fee...
Since the late sixties the field of creditors\u27 remedies has undergone a series of changes brought...
In recent years, there has been an increase in consumer protection class action litigation in federa...
Since Congress first enacted the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) in 1925, arbitration agreements have ...
Without even knowing it, just about everyone has agreed to settle disputes through arbitration and h...
The most noteworthy and important developments in trial practice and procedure during this survey pe...
(Excerpt) This Note determines that whether a named plaintiff has standing to assert claims relating...
The North Carolina General Assembly enacted the Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices Act in 1969. Th...
The Georgia Supreme Court reviewed, and reversed, two cases featured prominently in last year\u27s I...