Third-party copyright liability raises specific First Amendment problems that remain relatively unexplored. Among other things, such liability separates the danger of liability from the benefits of speaking, making key actors prone to careless censorship of speech. This Article applies the First Amendment to third-party copyright liability by drawing lessons from the famous cases of New York Times Co. v. Sullivan and Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. It concludes that vicarious liability should be sharply curtailed, and that the application of presumed damages is constitutionally problematic in many contributory liability cases
This Article studies the construction of third party copyright liability after the recent Supreme Co...
Copyright law exists to encourage the creation of works of authorship by granting exclusive rights. ...
Intellectual property regimes operate in the shadow of the First Amendment. By deeming a particular ...
Third-party copyright liability raises specific First Amendment problems that remain relatively unex...
Third-party copyright liability raises specific First Amendment problems that remain relatively unex...
Copyright law is a glaring and unjustified exception to the rule that the government may not prohibi...
Parties are increasingly raising the First Amendment as a potential limit on the scope of copyright ...
Expression eligible for copyright protection should be presumptively treated as speech for First Ame...
The relationship between copyright and the first amendment has been discussed repeatedly in the past...
The relationship between copyright and the first amendment has been discussed repeatedly in the past...
The copyright regime and the First Amendment seek to promote the same goals. Both seek the creation ...
We are at a crossroads with respect to the under-developed equitable defense of copyright misuse. Th...
Copyright law exists to encourage the creation of works of authorship by granting exclusive rights. ...
In Harper & Row, Publishers v. The Nation Enterprises, the Supreme Court was presented questions con...
The United States is often considered to be the most speech-protective country in the world. Paradox...
This Article studies the construction of third party copyright liability after the recent Supreme Co...
Copyright law exists to encourage the creation of works of authorship by granting exclusive rights. ...
Intellectual property regimes operate in the shadow of the First Amendment. By deeming a particular ...
Third-party copyright liability raises specific First Amendment problems that remain relatively unex...
Third-party copyright liability raises specific First Amendment problems that remain relatively unex...
Copyright law is a glaring and unjustified exception to the rule that the government may not prohibi...
Parties are increasingly raising the First Amendment as a potential limit on the scope of copyright ...
Expression eligible for copyright protection should be presumptively treated as speech for First Ame...
The relationship between copyright and the first amendment has been discussed repeatedly in the past...
The relationship between copyright and the first amendment has been discussed repeatedly in the past...
The copyright regime and the First Amendment seek to promote the same goals. Both seek the creation ...
We are at a crossroads with respect to the under-developed equitable defense of copyright misuse. Th...
Copyright law exists to encourage the creation of works of authorship by granting exclusive rights. ...
In Harper & Row, Publishers v. The Nation Enterprises, the Supreme Court was presented questions con...
The United States is often considered to be the most speech-protective country in the world. Paradox...
This Article studies the construction of third party copyright liability after the recent Supreme Co...
Copyright law exists to encourage the creation of works of authorship by granting exclusive rights. ...
Intellectual property regimes operate in the shadow of the First Amendment. By deeming a particular ...