Add to ORKG30 pagesWhen the recognition of foreign-country judgments is sought in the United States, it occurs that recognition is denied due to lack of jurisdiction. In the United States, jurisdiction of foreign courts is examined according to the same due process requirements of the U.S. Constitution that apply to direct jurisdiction and to the recognition of sister-state judgments. These criteria were developed in a national, federal, interstate context and are not appropriate for claims involving international elements, which necessarily follow jurisdictional concepts differently than the United States does
To what extent may a state court, or a federal court exercising diversity jurisdiction, assert in pe...
The proposed Hague Convention provides the United States with a guarantee that U.S. judgments in com...
All states have long-arm statutes permitting the exercise of jurisdiction over non-resident defendan...
The Supreme Courts recent reliance on foreign precedent to interpret the Constitution sparked a fire...
The Fifth Amendment\u27s Due Process Clause places limitations on courts\u27 judicial power. Due pro...
The rights of foreign states under the U.S. Constitution are becoming more important as the actions ...
This paper was written in an effort to highlight the guarantees of procedural due process that Ameri...
It is black-letter law that in order to recognize and enforce a foreign judgment, the rendering cour...
The Due Process Clause with its focus on a defendant\u27s liberty interest has become the key, if no...
Defining the scope of the Constitution’s application outside U.S. territory is more important than e...
The purpose of this Article is to locate the sources of jurisdictional doctrine. A coherent theory o...
A great deal has been written about the personal jurisdiction of state courts and particularly about...
Professor Wuerth’s article is a significant piece of scholarship. This brief comment is devoted, not...
In their article, Forum Non Conveniens and The Enforcement of Foreign Judgments, Christopher Whytock...
Pennsylvania\u27s foreign attachment procedures were held to be an unconstitutional violation of due...
To what extent may a state court, or a federal court exercising diversity jurisdiction, assert in pe...
The proposed Hague Convention provides the United States with a guarantee that U.S. judgments in com...
All states have long-arm statutes permitting the exercise of jurisdiction over non-resident defendan...
The Supreme Courts recent reliance on foreign precedent to interpret the Constitution sparked a fire...
The Fifth Amendment\u27s Due Process Clause places limitations on courts\u27 judicial power. Due pro...
The rights of foreign states under the U.S. Constitution are becoming more important as the actions ...
This paper was written in an effort to highlight the guarantees of procedural due process that Ameri...
It is black-letter law that in order to recognize and enforce a foreign judgment, the rendering cour...
The Due Process Clause with its focus on a defendant\u27s liberty interest has become the key, if no...
Defining the scope of the Constitution’s application outside U.S. territory is more important than e...
The purpose of this Article is to locate the sources of jurisdictional doctrine. A coherent theory o...
A great deal has been written about the personal jurisdiction of state courts and particularly about...
Professor Wuerth’s article is a significant piece of scholarship. This brief comment is devoted, not...
In their article, Forum Non Conveniens and The Enforcement of Foreign Judgments, Christopher Whytock...
Pennsylvania\u27s foreign attachment procedures were held to be an unconstitutional violation of due...
To what extent may a state court, or a federal court exercising diversity jurisdiction, assert in pe...
The proposed Hague Convention provides the United States with a guarantee that U.S. judgments in com...
All states have long-arm statutes permitting the exercise of jurisdiction over non-resident defendan...