Add to ORKGI would first like to congratulate Harald Wohlrapp on the substantial success of his book on the philosophy of argument. The learning, originality, and energetic dedication shown in this work are impressive indeed. Concerning Harald Wohlrapp’s theories, many fascinating issues arise, as we will be hearing today and in further conversations. In this presentation I shall concentrate on two aspects especially relevant to the treatment of pro and con argumentation; as will be apparent, even on this single topic more could be said. What I will discuss today are the themes of logicism and objectivity
People always talk, discuss, argue, criticize or contradict each other. Have you ever thought of how...
Argumentations are at the heart of the deductive and the hypothetico-deductive methods, which are in...
The first two sections of this paper jointly comprise an edited version of the commentary I presente...
The last number of Informal Logic, Vol. 37, No. 3, was devoted to a discussion by five scholars of v...
The theoretical labor carried out over the past half-century in the field of argumentation theory ha...
Harald Wohlrapp’s The Concept of Argument has made a significant contribution to the argumentation t...
The paper provides a series of responses to the papers published in Vol. 37, No. 3, of this journal ...
When a new theory of argumentation becomes available on the English-speaking market, such as it is h...
In this special issue, we are fortunate to be able to publish a series of papers on Harald Wohlrapp...
The paper argues that argument and argumentation deserve philosophical attention but do not receive ...
Logic is concerned with the design or structure of arguments. It describes the forms of valid argume...
This chapter discusses how formal models of argumentation can clarify philosophical problems and iss...
Open access article.This paper aims to determine whether rhetoric has a place in Wohlrapp's theory o...
How to provide, in only 10 minutes, a kind of insight into the conception of argument that I have di...
Abstract Argument is seen as central to philosophy, especially epistemology. It is often s...
People always talk, discuss, argue, criticize or contradict each other. Have you ever thought of how...
Argumentations are at the heart of the deductive and the hypothetico-deductive methods, which are in...
The first two sections of this paper jointly comprise an edited version of the commentary I presente...
The last number of Informal Logic, Vol. 37, No. 3, was devoted to a discussion by five scholars of v...
The theoretical labor carried out over the past half-century in the field of argumentation theory ha...
Harald Wohlrapp’s The Concept of Argument has made a significant contribution to the argumentation t...
The paper provides a series of responses to the papers published in Vol. 37, No. 3, of this journal ...
When a new theory of argumentation becomes available on the English-speaking market, such as it is h...
In this special issue, we are fortunate to be able to publish a series of papers on Harald Wohlrapp...
The paper argues that argument and argumentation deserve philosophical attention but do not receive ...
Logic is concerned with the design or structure of arguments. It describes the forms of valid argume...
This chapter discusses how formal models of argumentation can clarify philosophical problems and iss...
Open access article.This paper aims to determine whether rhetoric has a place in Wohlrapp's theory o...
How to provide, in only 10 minutes, a kind of insight into the conception of argument that I have di...
Abstract Argument is seen as central to philosophy, especially epistemology. It is often s...
People always talk, discuss, argue, criticize or contradict each other. Have you ever thought of how...
Argumentations are at the heart of the deductive and the hypothetico-deductive methods, which are in...
The first two sections of this paper jointly comprise an edited version of the commentary I presente...